BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Rabies CR

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pandeyvineet24 » Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:11 am
IMO B
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:13 pm
pandeyvineet24 wrote:IMO B

pandeyji,
why B ?
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:29 pm
mmslf75 wrote:
pandeyvineet24 wrote:IMO B

pandeyji,
why B ?


A,D,E are out of scope.
C is again out because the argument talks about the confirmed cases and not the appearance of the symptoms.

Compared to 2 years ago, when it was 25%, the percentage of raccoons suffering from disease went up to 50% , but the number of confirmed cases have come down from 32 to 18. Most probably this happened because the number of raccoons have come down, which is what the statement B says, a large number of raccoons died two years ago. Also of the few ones that survived, the higher percentage of raccoons are still sufferring from the disease.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:33 pm
OA : B

Cheers Vineet!!

what abt sharks CR??
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:35 pm
pandeyvineet24 wrote:
mmslf75 wrote:
pandeyvineet24 wrote:IMO B

pandeyji,
why B ?


A,D,E are out of scope.
C is again out because the argument talks about the confirmed cases and not the appearance of the symptoms.

Compared to 2 years ago, when it was 25%, the percentage of raccoons suffering from disease went up to 50% , but the number of confirmed cases have come down from 32 to 18. Most probably this happened because the number of raccoons have come down, which is what the statement B says, a large number of raccoons died two years ago. Also of the few ones that survived, the higher percentage of raccoons are still sufferring from the disease.
Pandeyji,
aah get the point !!

one thing noticed these proportion number concepts rest on similar type of reasoning right ??


You mean :


Today 2010
50% of 36 = 18
[/i]


2008
25% of 128 = 32

So even though perccentage increased , the value decreased to 18 as the " signifcant number of racoon succumbed "
Join the discussion