BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:50 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth century. Overgrazing by the enormous population of rabbits now menaces the island's agriculture. The government proposes to reduce the population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit populations elsewhere. There is, however, a chance that the virus will infect the bilby, an endangered native marsupial. The government's plan, therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture but will clearly increase the threat to native wildlife.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. There is less chance that the virus will infect domestic animals on Numa than that it will infect bilbies.
B. There are no species of animals on the island that prey on the rabbits.
C. Overgrazing by rabbits endangers many of the plants on which bilbies feed.
D. The virus that the government proposes to use has been successfully used elsewhere to control populations of rabbits.
E. There is no alternative means of reducing the rabbit population that would involve no threat to the bilby.

OA C

Source: GMAT Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:55 am
OPTION A - INCORRECT
This option seems to look out for the bilby which is clearly in favour of the argument, so this doesn't weaken the argument.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
This doesn't weaken the argument because the argument isn't concern about animals that can prey on the rabbit. Although, it will reduce the population of the rabbits as proposed by the government but it might also prey on the bilby, and since there are non, it doesn't weaken the argument.

OPTION C - CORRECT
If overgrazing by the rabbits endangers the bilbies which the government is trying to protect, it weakens the argument because it clearly increases the treat to native wildlife.

OPTION D - INCORRECT
This doesn't weaken the argument because it implies that the virus the government proposes to use is effective since it has been successfully used elsewhere to control the population of Rabbits.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
This doesn't cause the most serious weakness to the argument because it doesn't mean that the bilby will be endangered, it merely claims that there is no alternative means of reducing the rabbits that will involve no threat to the bilby
Join the discussion