BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question regarding SC

Expert replies
by PL » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:21 am
Hi All

I have a question regarding verb tense. Which kind of verb should follow in "should have" sentences - Simple past or past participle? Is there any rule for this.

Ex:
You should have drank the water
You should have drunk the water (doesn't sound right, but not sure)

You should have sang the song
You should have sung the song (doesn't sound right, but not sure)

You should have saw the event
You should have seen the event (Sounds right in this case. But past participle is used here. Is that right?)


Thanks in advance

-- PL
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Danielle » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:25 am
It's should have + past participle. It's a simple rule...where it becomes more complicated is when you have irregular verbs that have past participles that are different from the regular past tense of the verb (for most verbs they are the same, hence the confusion).

All your examples are of irregular verbs!

1. drunk is the past participle of 'to drink', therefore should have drunk

2. sung is the past participle of 'to sing', therefore should have sung

3. seen is the past participle of 'to see', therefore should have seen

Suggestion: Maybe taking a look at a list of conjugated common irregular verbs. You'll see what I mean about past tense and past participles.

Please let me know if you need more on this.
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

by PL » Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:41 pm
Thanks Danielle. It is clear now.

-- PL
Join the discussion

by Danielle » Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:55 pm
Cool glad that I could help!
Verbal Tutor
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1