Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Question Pack 1 CR | The technological conservatism of bicyc

Expert replies
by richachampion » Mon May 08, 2017 8:41 pm
The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?

(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall
outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
(D) The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being altered to suit different national markets.
(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by elias.latour.apex » Tue May 09, 2017 3:41 am
As always, we start by reading the question first. It tells us that we are looking for an assumption made in drawing the conclusion.

What's the conclusion? It is: innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.

Why? Because The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.

Did you notice any new, surprising words in the conclusion? The premise talks about bicycle racers, but the conclusion talks about standard for purposes of competition. Is there a connection between those two things? The author assumes that there is.

(C) is the best answer. It is the one that connects the idea in the premise (bicycle racers) to the idea in the conclusion (standard for purposes of competition).

But imagine that you didn't see that. Is there another way to get to the answer? Sure. Use the why test.

C: Innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Why?
A: Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition, and
P: The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.

Does that make sense? I think it does. But what if you're still not convinced? Try negating the conclusion to see whether the argument fails.

C: Innovation in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for purposes of competition in bicycle races.
Why?
A: Bicycle racers generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition, and
P: The only cyclists seriously interested in innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers.

Does this argument make sense? No, it does not. If racers generate a strong demand for innovations that fall outside the official standard, then the conclusion is false.
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Join the discussion