BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question No 89 in OG 11

Expert replies
by captcha » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:36 pm
(1) K^1 is not equal to 1^k for some numbers k
is K^(l+m) = (k^l)+(k^m)
--> "^" is clearly "-". [As for "+" & "x" 1+k=k+1; & 1xk=kx1;]

So, k-(l+m) = (k-l)+(k-m)
=> k-l-m = 2k - l -m
(for all k except k=0, which is only 1 number atleast 2 values of k required to say "for some numbers")

Ans to original problem is no. Hence, Statement 1 alone is sufficient.

(2) As above if ^ is -, the two sides of the equation are not equal. The answer to original question is No & statement 2 alone is sufficient to deduce this.

Therefore, both statements are alone sufficient to solve the problem.

IMO D.

Don't forget to say thanks, if you like the answer
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by fskilnik@GMATH » Mon Dec 20, 2010 11:04 pm
smalltown wrote:If ^ represents one of the operators +, -, and x, is k^(l+m) = (k^l) + (k^m) for all numbers of k, l, and m ?

(1) k^1 is not equal to 1^k for some numbers k
(2) ^ represents subtraction.

But I think statement '2' alone cannot answer the question as the question clearly asks 'is k^(l+m) = (k^l) + (k^m) for all numbers of k, l, and m' ? As per statement 2, if k is zero, then answer is Yes. If k is not equal to zero, then answer is No. So I think answer should not be either 'B' or 'D' .

Could you please explain where I made mistake ? How to solve this kind of problems ?
What should we assume if question says 'for some numbers' ?
Hi smalltown!

When you are asked if a sentence is true for all numbers, you DECIDE that if:
you are able to prove that the sentence IS true for ALL numbers
OR
if you are able to prove that the sentence is NOT true for A PARTICULAR case!

In other words, sttm (2) is sufficient to answer the question asked because you can easily find ONE EXAMPLE of k, l and m such that k^(l+m) = (k^l) + (k^m) is NOT true when ^is the subtraction operation.

I hope things are clear now.

Regards,
Fabio.

P.S.: in this scenario, a sttm would NOT decide if you had the following situation: ^ could be at least 2 different operations, in the first one you could prove that it would answer in the affirmative, that is, the sentence would be true for all numbers k, l and m, but in the second option for ^ the sentence would be answered in the negative, that is, you would be able to find an example of k, l and m such that the sentence would not be true for that particular ^ operation.

P.S.2: please note that sttm (1) is sufficient to answer the question asked because from this sttm we know that the operation ^MUST BE (between the choices offered, for sure) the subtraction, because if it were the addition or multiplication, you would have k^1 = 1^k for all values of k!! From the fact that we know that ^is subtraction, we know that sttm (1) decides the question asked, as explained above.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by Woozler » Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:50 am
They're asking you whether k^(l+m) = (k^l) + (k^m) is true for ALL numbers, and you, it seems, are trying to pick particular numbers (for statement 2) that may work (if one of them is zero). THIS IS NOT WHAT THE QUESTION IS ASKING YOU. They're asking you if it's true for ALL numbers, not "some".

Anyway, the only way that k^(l+m) = (k^l) + (k^m) can work for all k, l, m is if ^ is multiplication.

(1) clearly states that k^1 is NOT 1^k in all instances, which is a clear violation of the commutativity rule (a*b = b*a) that we all learned in middle school. Thus, ^ is not multiplication and (1) is sufficient.

(2) very clearly states that ^ is not multiplication, and is also sufficient.

Therefore, (D)
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:41 pm
Woozler wrote:Anyway, the only way that k^(l+m) = (k^l) + (k^m) can work for all k, l, m is if ^ is multiplication.
Important: Woozler´s statement is true if ^ is to be chosen among the operations offered in this question stem.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion