What is the source of the questions you have posted?
I ask because I don't believe the GMAT would use the term "natural number"
I say this because not everyone agrees on the definition of natural numbers (some include 0 and others don't).
More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number
Also, the term "natural number" appears nowhere in the Official Guide.
Cheers,
Brent
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Question in the attachment
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
How to treat 0^0 is a long-running debate, one the GMAT would likely take great pains to avoid: https://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.0.to.0.power.htmleitijan wrote:Source: IMS
Here, x cant be zero as 0^0 is not defined.
So can we ignore that case ?

















