Using the simplest decision-point in each option, you could approach the question in this way:
1. In the given sentence, EXCITED WITH is unidiomatic. The correct form is EXCITED ABOUT. Whenever you identify a mistake, you should look for its repetition in another option. Proceeding in this way would allow you to eliminate options A and E.
2. Option B has a simple grammatical error: the subject is PROSPECTS, but the verb of which that noun is the subject is singular: WAS. This should be WERE.
3. You could knock out D on the grounds that EXCITED ... AND PREDICTED is a false parallel. EXCITED works here as an adjective describing Nikola Tesla; PREDICTED, on the other hand, is a verb. Given that it is a verb, what is its subject? It can only be Nicola Tesla, but the clumsy construction of the option leaves unclear what any good option must make perfectly clear.
Look, by way of contrast, at the way the correct answer is constructed: EXCITED ..., NIKOLA TESLA ... PREDICTED at a certain time that something would happen. The phrases and clauses are all in a logical relation to one another and create a logical sequence of ideas - and logical sequences of ideas are what the GMAT is principally interested in.
If you like this post, please click on the THANK button.
You can also visit us at
https://www.xgmat.com/