BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question from Mc Graw Hill Practice test 1

Expert replies
by nubu » Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:31 am
The police chief argued that first-time
offenders who have no high school diploma
but who have families with a record of crime

will probably break the law again.

A. who have no high school diploma but who
have families with a record of crime
B. without a high school diploma and
families having a criminal record
C. without a high school diploma whose
families have a record of crime
D. whose families have criminal records and
lacking high school diplomas
E. lacking high school diplomas and also
having families having criminal records

C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by gmat_perfect » Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:01 am
nubu wrote:The police chief argued that first-time
offenders who have no high school diploma
but who have families with a record of crime

will probably break the law again.

A. who have no high school diploma but who
have families with a record of crime
B. without a high school diploma and
families having a criminal record
C. without a high school diploma whose
families have a record of crime
D. whose families have criminal records and
lacking high school diplomas
E. lacking high school diplomas and also
having families having criminal records

C
I see only A is the best of all the options.

C has a problem of "whose".

Diploma whose families ... means that diploma has family.

Experts, please come and comment.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by jaymw » Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:47 am
definitely A, although technically families with recordS of crime would make even more sense.

B) without ...noun...and having -> not parallel

C) diploma whose families -> the diploma doesnt have families

D) whose..noun phrase... and having -> not parallel

E) offenders [...] having families having ... -> awkward and ambiguous to say the least
Join the discussion

by phoenixhazard » Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:28 am
nubu wrote:The police chief argued that first-time
offenders who have no high school diploma
but who have families with a record of crime

will probably break the law again.

A. who have no high school diploma but who
have families with a record of crime
B. without a high school diploma and
families having a criminal record
C. without a high school diploma whose
families have a record of crime
D. whose families have criminal records and
lacking high school diplomas
E. lacking high school diplomas and also
having families having criminal records

C
None sound great to me, definitely has to be A or B I feel though. "but who" in A seems to be a problem, why would but be in the statement, it is not refuting anything? B has the problem with "and families having," it should state and whose families since families refers to the student and is not independent.
Join the discussion

by ov25 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:32 pm
I would have to side with C...

Here is my take

'whose families' can only modify living beings in the sentence, which are 'offenders'. so there is no ambiguity. Moreover C is clear and concise.

A has a problem with 'but who'. the phrase 'with a record of crime' has no clear referrent. could be offenders or their families.
Join the discussion

by jaymw » Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:03 pm
I don't think the "but" in A is a big problem

...offenders who DON'T have something (diploma), BUT WHO have something else (criminal families).

What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:01 am
nubu wrote:The police chief argued that first-time
offenders who have no high school diploma
but who have families with a record of crime

will probably break the law again.

A. who have no high school diploma but who
have families with a record of crime
B. without a high school diploma and
families having a criminal record
C. without a high school diploma whose
families have a record of crime
D. whose families have criminal records and
lacking high school diplomas
E. lacking high school diplomas and also
having families having criminal records

C
i also chose A and check McGraw Hill books and its official answer is C . and here is its explanation
A is less concise and its unclear why " but" is used here for??? dun understand!?!
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:22 am
In my response I will only comment about Choice A since the question pertains to why "but" is incorrect in choice A.

"But" is used to express a contrast. Now the contrast should be between two seemingly contrasting elements. In choice A, but establishes a contrast between the following facts:

people who do not have a high school diploma
people whose families have a record of crime

Now these two facts are not comparable. In my mind, these are two independent facts that do not have any direct bearing on one another. If we had to choose between two conjunctions "but" and "and", I would have chosen "and" since these are independent facts.
Join the discussion

by nubu » Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:59 am
I chose A and did not agree with OA (C) and the explanation. "Whose" should not stand behind diploma

* the best GMAT books just include OG, Manhattan and Cracking the Gmat. Kaplan is also good but I don't think it is close to standard GMAT test. Master the GMAT of Peterson and Mc Graw Hill are far behind. That's just my personal opinion. How do you think?
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:41 am
I do not find the placement of "whose" in choice C correct. That is why I only responded to the query about usage of "but" in choice A since there is definitely good learning in that aspect of the question - it pertains to using the correct conjunction per the intended and the logical meaning of the sentence.
Join the discussion

by nox104 » Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:29 pm
I chose C. I agree with ov25's and e-gmat's explanations.

- "But" should contrast 2 sentence elements, here there's no contrast whatsoever.
- Whose is correctly modifying offenders.
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:46 am
e-GMAT wrote:In my response I will only comment about Choice A since the question pertains to why "but" is incorrect in choice A.

"But" is used to express a contrast. Now the contrast should be between two seemingly contrasting elements. In choice A, but establishes a contrast between the following facts:

people who do not have a high school diploma
people whose families have a record of crime

Now these two facts are not comparable. In my mind, these are two independent facts that do not have any direct bearing on one another. If we had to choose between two conjunctions "but" and "and", I would have chosen "and" since these are independent facts.
now got it, thank you indeed!
Join the discussion

by gmat1011 » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:21 am
find it hard to believe any option with A record of crime (in singular) can be right. how can familiesS have a record - they have one record? i would have picked one from D or E though both are rather awkward... the answer is supposed to be C
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1