Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Question about problem 89 from OG 11 (page 285)

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:07 pm
by gmattic » Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:54 pm
This question asks if the following equation is valid:
k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m)

where _ can be one of the following operations:
+, -, x (ie: addition, subtraction, or multiplication)

the statements are :
(1) k _ 1 != 1 _ k for some k
(2) _ represents subtraction

The answer is 'D' because it claims 'subraction' is the operation.

I don't understand why since
k - (l + m) does NOT equal (k - l) + (k - m)

Is this an error in the book or am I missing something?

Thanks
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16206
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

Re: Question about problem 89 from OG 11 (page 285)

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:13 pm
gmattic wrote:This question asks if the following equation is valid:
k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m)

where _ can be one of the following operations:
+, -, x (ie: addition, subtraction, or multiplication)

the statements are :
(1) k _ 1 != 1 _ k for some k
(2) _ represents subtraction

The answer is 'D' because it claims 'subraction' is the operation.

I don't understand why since
k - (l + m) does NOT equal (k - l) + (k - m)

Is this an error in the book or am I missing something?

Thanks
Keep in mind that the over-reaching question here is "Do we have enough information to determine whether we can answer the question "Is the equation k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m) valid?"

(2) If the operation is subtraction then the equation is NOT valid.
So, using the information in statement (2), we have definitively answered the question "Is the equation k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m) valid?" The answer to this question is a resounding no.
So, statement (2) is sufficient
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:54 am
Thanked: 2 times

by glorydefined » Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:44 pm
Hi,

This ones pretty simple, the question asks if the following eq is valid :

k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m)

for the above eq to be valid "_" should be multiplicaiton. so basically the question is asking whether "_" is multiplication or not.

stmt 1: k _ 1 != 1 _ k for some k

this statement says "_" is subtraction. (only then the above eq will be valid). So it answers our main question, which is "k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m)" is invalid. Hence SUFFCIENT

stamt 2: _ represents subtraction

this statement also says the same thing. Which makes the main question invalid. Hence SUFFCIENT.

ANSWER D
Top
Join the discussion

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16206
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

Re: Question about problem 89 from OG 11 (page 285)

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:17 pm
gmattic wrote:This question asks if the following equation is valid:
k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m)

where _ can be one of the following operations:
+, -, x (ie: addition, subtraction, or multiplication)

the statements are :
(1) k _ 1 != 1 _ k for some k
(2) _ represents subtraction

The answer is 'D' because it claims 'subraction' is the operation.

I don't understand why since
k - (l + m) does NOT equal (k - l) + (k - m)

Is this an error in the book or am I missing something?

Thanks
I didn't comment on statement (1) because I wasn't sure what != means.
If this is just a typo and statement (1) is meant to read k _ 1 = 1 _ k for some k then _ could be any of the 4 operations when k=1.

What is the original wording of the question?
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Question about problem 89 from OG 11 (page 285)

by gmattic » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:22 pm
Brent Hanneson wrote:
gmattic wrote:This question asks if the following equation is valid:
k _ (l + m) = (k _ l) + (k _ m)

where _ can be one of the following operations:
+, -, x (ie: addition, subtraction, or multiplication)

the statements are :
(1) k _ 1 != 1 _ k for some k
(2) _ represents subtraction

The answer is 'D' because it claims 'subraction' is the operation.

I don't understand why since
k - (l + m) does NOT equal (k - l) + (k - m)

Is this an error in the book or am I missing something?

Thanks
I didn't comment on statement (1) because I wasn't sure what != means.
If this is just a typo and statement (1) is meant to read k _ 1 = 1 _ k for some k then _ could be any of the 4 operations when k=1.

What is the original wording of the question?
!= means 'does not equal'. Sorry for the confusion, its how you denote 'does not equal' in programming.

Thanks for the answer folks.
Top
Join the discussion