BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

question about absolute values

Expert replies
by jamesk486 » Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:38 pm
Is |x|>1?
(1) |x|>3
(2)|x+8| > 3 |x-2|

(1) is sufficient
but i had a question about (2)
so there are 4 cases, (i) when |x+8| >0, (ii) |x+8|<0, (iii) |x-2|<0, and (iv) |x-2| >0

so then is this how you solve it?
case (i) |x+8| > 3 |x-2| (both are positive)
case (ii) -|x+8| > 3 |x-2|
case (iii) -|x+8| > -3 |x-2| (both are negative)
case (iv) |x+8| > -3 |x-2|

is this right??
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatters2vj » Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:48 pm
Hi James,
Do u really need to solve it?

For case 2 i have the following explanation:

|x+8| > 3 |x-2|

Please note that this condition is true for x=0 i.e.
when x=0, 8>6. For this |x|<1.
But when we take x=2
we get 10>0 which is true. For this |x|>1.

Thus insufficient.

Answer must be A.
Whats the answer?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:50 am
Ian,
Canyou please comment on a proper way to solve part 2?

I came up with following concludion:

-------------|-----------------------------|-------------
-8 2

For x<-8, -(x+8) > -3(x-2) OR x>-1
-8<x<2, x+8 > -3(x-2) or x>-1/2
x>2 x+8 > 3(x-2) or x<7

question is how to come to an conclusion, is my line no correct
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:34 am
maihuna wrote:Ian,
Canyou please comment on a proper way to solve part 2?

I came up with following concludion:

-------------|-----------------------------|-------------
-8 2

For x<-8, -(x+8) > -3(x-2) OR x>-1
-8<x<2, x+8 > -3(x-2) or x>-1/2
x>2 x+8 > 3(x-2) or x<7

question is how to come to an conclusion, is my line no correct
Yes, your analysis is correct, though I've highlighted one line above: when you assumed that x < -8, you then found x > -1. The conclusion contradicts your assumption (x can't both be less than -8 and greater than -1), so this case is impossible, and you should ignore it. The other two cases are perfectly consistent, and combining their conclusions, you have that -1/2 < x < 7.

If you use the fact that |a - b| just represents the distance between a and b on the number line, we can rewrite Statement 2 as:

|x - (-8)| > 3 |x - 2|

In words, this says "x is more than three times as far from -8 as it is from 2". So, x must be closer to 2 than to -8. That's another way to see that x cannot possibly be less than -8, so we don't need to consider that case.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:05 am
Ian,

Needed your help on the below logic.

Statement 2:
|x + 3| > 3 |x - 2|

3 is positive. |x - 2| has to be positive too. Hence |x + 3| has to be positive.

Now,

x - 3 > 3 (x-2)

Simplify to get x < 7.

Insufficient.

Am i right here?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Fri May 01, 2009 12:25 pm
aj5105 wrote:Ian,

Needed your help on the below logic.

Statement 2:
|x + 3| > 3 |x - 2|

3 is positive. |x - 2| has to be positive too. Hence |x + 3| has to be positive.

Now,

x - 3 > 3 (x-2)

Simplify to get x < 7.

Insufficient.

Am i right here?
Your Statement 2 seems to be different from the one in the question above, but in any case, I don't follow the logic you're using here. I'm guessing you're replacing |x-2| with x-2 (removing the absolute value) because, as you say, |x-2| is positive? If that's what you were doing, that's not correct. |x-2| will always be positive (unless x = 2, in which case it equals zero). If we want to get rid of the absolute value, what we want to know is whether what's inside the absolute value is positive or negative:

|y| = y is y is positive
|y| = -y if y is negative

It's because of this that algebraic solutions to absolute value problems often require different cases. Here, for example, |x-2| = x-2 *if* x-2 is positive (i.e. if x > 2). On the other hand, |x-2| = -(x-2) if x-2 is negative (i.e. if x < 2).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Fri May 01, 2009 12:31 pm
Ian I am confused now, does it mean equal to zero is another case?
Join the discussion

by Uri » Fri May 01, 2009 1:23 pm

(1) is sufficient.
(2)|x+8| > 3 |x-2|
if (x-2)>0, then (x+8)>0
so, x+8>3(x-2)
simplifying we get, x<7
if (x-2)<0, then we can write,
x+8>3(2-x)
simplifying we get, x>-1/2
thus -1/2<x<7
so, |x| is not necessarily greater than 1. hence, insufficient.
Ans. (A)

i hate absolute value inequality problems. can anyone help us with some good tutorial on solving this type of problem?
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Fri May 01, 2009 1:48 pm
maihuna wrote:Ian I am confused now, does it mean equal to zero is another case?
No, you can include zero in either case, since:

|y| = y if y > 0

|y| = -y if y < 0
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion