Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Quant #3

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic
Expert replies
by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:58 am
Image

This one I did a few calculations, I know its an easy one, but since I haven't touched elementary math in years, I am totally missing the fundamentals here.

The correct answer as far as I can recall is 2/5.

Can anyone explain?
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:16 am
As you know that larger tank can fill in half hours two working together will take less than half hour only a and c remains
now total tank cannot be filled in 1/4 hours (try it) only c remains
hope that helps.
post your questions in problem solving /ds sections for quant
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:12 am
Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:24 am
anirudhbhalotia wrote:Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Ok, first of all there is a formula for solving this problem

1/A + 1/B = 1/T
Where A is the time taken by Say Person x to perform a work individually and B is time taken by say person y to perform the same work individually and T is the time required to perform the same work when both person x and person y work together, obviously the combined effect will reduce the time, now lets plug our values in this formula
1/1/2 + 1/2 = 1/T

2+1/2 = 1/T
5/2 = 1/T
T = 2/5 = 0.4

other way to solve is logic -
Larger fills in 1/2 - full tank.
1/2 tank by larger in 1/4 hours
Smaller fills in 2 hours - full tank
in 1/2 hours it will fill 1/8 of the tank.
so total tank filled till now - 1/2+1/8 = 5/8, remaining is 3/8
in next 1/4 hour (working same as above) tank will fill to 5/8 + 5/8 = 10/8 approx = 1.2
so slightly less time (less than 1/2 hours) is needed to fill the tank.
1/3 is less, tank will still be left to fill so 2/5 = 0.4 is the answer.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:33 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote:
anirudhbhalotia wrote:Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Ok, first of all there is a formula for solving this problem

1/A + 1/B = 1/T
Where A is the time taken by Say Person x to perform a work individually and B is time taken by say person y to perform the same work individually and T is the time required to perform the same work when both person x and person y work together, obviously the combined effect will reduce the time, now lets plug our values in this formula
1/1/2 + 1/2 = 1/T

2+1/2 = 1/T
5/2 = 1/T
T = 2/5 = 0.4

other way to solve is logic -
Larger fills in 1/2 - full tank.
1/2 tank by larger in 1/4 hours
Smaller fills in 2 hours - full tank
in 1/2 hours it will fill 1/8 of the tank.
so total tank filled till now - 1/2+1/8 = 5/8, remaining is 3/8
in next 1/4 hour (working same as above) tank will fill to 5/8 + 5/8 = 10/8 approx = 1.2
so slightly less time (less than 1/2 hours) is needed to fill the tank.
1/3 is less, tank will still be left to fill so 2/5 = 0.4 is the answer.

Wonderful, the first method works like a charm!

2nd method seems complicated to me!
Join the discussion