BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Quant #3

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:58 am
Image

This one I did a few calculations, I know its an easy one, but since I haven't touched elementary math in years, I am totally missing the fundamentals here.

The correct answer as far as I can recall is 2/5.

Can anyone explain?
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:16 am
As you know that larger tank can fill in half hours two working together will take less than half hour only a and c remains
now total tank cannot be filled in 1/4 hours (try it) only c remains
hope that helps.
post your questions in problem solving /ds sections for quant
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:12 am
Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:24 am
anirudhbhalotia wrote:Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Ok, first of all there is a formula for solving this problem

1/A + 1/B = 1/T
Where A is the time taken by Say Person x to perform a work individually and B is time taken by say person y to perform the same work individually and T is the time required to perform the same work when both person x and person y work together, obviously the combined effect will reduce the time, now lets plug our values in this formula
1/1/2 + 1/2 = 1/T

2+1/2 = 1/T
5/2 = 1/T
T = 2/5 = 0.4

other way to solve is logic -
Larger fills in 1/2 - full tank.
1/2 tank by larger in 1/4 hours
Smaller fills in 2 hours - full tank
in 1/2 hours it will fill 1/8 of the tank.
so total tank filled till now - 1/2+1/8 = 5/8, remaining is 3/8
in next 1/4 hour (working same as above) tank will fill to 5/8 + 5/8 = 10/8 approx = 1.2
so slightly less time (less than 1/2 hours) is needed to fill the tank.
1/3 is less, tank will still be left to fill so 2/5 = 0.4 is the answer.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:33 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote:
anirudhbhalotia wrote:Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Ok, first of all there is a formula for solving this problem

1/A + 1/B = 1/T
Where A is the time taken by Say Person x to perform a work individually and B is time taken by say person y to perform the same work individually and T is the time required to perform the same work when both person x and person y work together, obviously the combined effect will reduce the time, now lets plug our values in this formula
1/1/2 + 1/2 = 1/T

2+1/2 = 1/T
5/2 = 1/T
T = 2/5 = 0.4

other way to solve is logic -
Larger fills in 1/2 - full tank.
1/2 tank by larger in 1/4 hours
Smaller fills in 2 hours - full tank
in 1/2 hours it will fill 1/8 of the tank.
so total tank filled till now - 1/2+1/8 = 5/8, remaining is 3/8
in next 1/4 hour (working same as above) tank will fill to 5/8 + 5/8 = 10/8 approx = 1.2
so slightly less time (less than 1/2 hours) is needed to fill the tank.
1/3 is less, tank will still be left to fill so 2/5 = 0.4 is the answer.

Wonderful, the first method works like a charm!

2nd method seems complicated to me!
Join the discussion