BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Qualitex

Expert replies
by zaarathelab » Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:45 am
A significant number of Qualitex Corporation's department heads are due to
retire this year. The number of employees other than current department heads
who could take on the position of department head is equal to only about half of
the expected vacancies. Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from
outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one
department, so some departments will be without department heads next year
unless Qualitex ______.

A. promotes some current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
B. raises the salary for department heads
C. reduces the number of new employees it hires next year
D. reduces the average number of employees per department
E. reduces the number of its departments
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:47 am
IMO E

As A talks about promting current department heads to higher-level managerial positions - Not linked anywhere

B It has not been mentioned that raising salary will help anyways

C No relevence

D No relevence

Hence answer is E

Whats the OA
Ashish

If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:01 am
IMO A

In fact E is very Lucrative.....and I want to choose E. But as a logic, It does not sink to me. E means the company will cut itself but not increase the department heads. Just because of that I choose A.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:24 am
But A says to promote current department heads to higher managerial level here the issue is to how to fill the "departmental head" position (not higher managerial level position) which will not be resolved by A.
Ashish

If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:47 am
Hi Ashish,

That is why I said it is very good option....The only thing for me is that it fails logically.....any organization would not want to reduce itself...We need to know the official answer to see what happens..I dont have any reason to remove "E" otherwise.

In a I bring the assumption that if DH are promoted to higher level, they can over look more departments.....Notice, that the stimulus says that the Department heads are not allowed to see more than one Deptt....But once promoted, they are not deptt. heads anymore.


Gunjan
Join the discussion

by vaibhavgupta » Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:14 am
zaarathelab wrote:A significant number of Qualitex Corporation's department heads are due to
retire this year. The number of employees other than current department heads
who could take on the position of department head is equal to only about half of
the expected vacancies. Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from
outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one
department, so some departments will be without department heads next year
unless Qualitex ______.

A. promotes some current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
B. raises the salary for department heads
C. reduces the number of new employees it hires next year
D. reduces the average number of employees per department
E. reduces the number of its departments
IMOC

pls tell the OA..
If OA is A, IMO B
If OA is B, IMO C
If OA is C, IMO D
If OA is D, IMO E
If OA is E, IMO A

FML!! :/
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:16 am
Let us use maths in this problem !!

A significant number of Qualitex Corporation's department heads = N
are due to retire this year. = N is decreasing , but we need to keep N constant by adding values to it !!! let us assume that X person left so we need to add X to make it N

The number of employees other than current department heads
who could take on the position of department head is equal to only about half of
the expected vacancies. - the numebr available to be added is only X/2, we have to compensate the rest.
Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from
outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one
department,- X/2 cannot be increased from outside source.

this is the problem : now lets see the answer choice, what can be done to compensate the decrease

A - irrelevant
B - irrelevant, the heads are retiring not leaving because their compensation is low
C - Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from
outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one
department - this is a company policy so cannot be changed,
even if it hired it wont solve the problem at hand.
D - irrelevant
E - yes !!! it is it
from the above understanding :
N department ---- N heads...( this is decreasing to N - X )
now if we decrease the number of departments the problem will be solved !!
N-X departments ---- N-X heads ..



Hope this helps !!!
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:06 pm
Zara,
need OA, please.
Join the discussion

by vzzai » Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:31 am
IMO E
Thank you,
Vj
Join the discussion

by zaarathelab » Fri Nov 04, 2011 10:23 pm
zaarathelab wrote:A significant number of Qualitex Corporation's department heads are due to
retire this year. The number of employees other than current department heads
who could take on the position of department head is equal to only about half of
the expected vacancies. Oualitex is not going to hire department heads from
outside the company or have current department heads take over more than one
department, so some departments will be without department heads next year
unless Qualitex ______.

A. promotes some current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
B. raises the salary for department heads
C. reduces the number of new employees it hires next year
D. reduces the average number of employees per department
E. reduces the number of its departments
OA IS E, but i chose A.

Experts pls provide a suitable explanation
Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck)
Join the discussion