BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Q from gmatprep

Expert replies
by mkhanna » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:40 am
Economist: On average, the emergency treatment for an elderly person for injuries resulting from a fall costs $11,000. A new therapeutic program can significantly reduce an elderly person's chances of falling. Though obviously desirable for many reasons, this treatment program will cost $12,500 and thus cannot be justified.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion of the argument?

a)Among elderly people who had followed the program for only a few months, the number of serious falls reported was higher than it was for people who had followed the program for its recommended minimum length of one year.

b)Falls resulting in serious injuries are less common among elderly people living in nursing homes than they are among elderly people who live alone at home.

c)A frequent result of injuries sustained in falls is long-term pain, medication for which is not counted
among the average per-person costs of emergency treatment for elderly people's injuries from such falls.

d)The new therapeutic program focuses on therapies other than medication, since overmedication can cause disorientation and hence increase the likelihood that
an elderly person will have a serious fall.
e)A significant portion of the cost of the new therapeutic program is represented by regular visits by healthcare professionals, the cost of which tend to increase more rapidly than do those of other elements of the program.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by alex10 » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:50 am
IMO C.

OA please.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:52 am
Join the discussion

by abhishekkishore12 » Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:56 am
IMO C
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by aks.anupam » Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:34 pm
IMO C.

OA?
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:41 am
causal relation, another cause

D weakens by saying that 12500 give more benifit although more expensive.
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:28 am
IMO C

Conclusion: Alternate therapeutic treatment not justified

Premise/ Reason: Cost of therapeutic treatment is more than cost of treating falls

Option C weakens the premise and directly negates it.

Hence the conclusion is weakened as the the justification for the conclusion has been undermined.


OA pls.

Cheers
TJ
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion

by umaa » Fri Oct 02, 2009 4:37 am
The OA is C. Found it in another forum.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by srivas » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:16 am
It is C only
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:37 pm
I would go with option C as the correct option
Join the discussion