BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Q from gmatprep

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times
by nasa » Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:14 pm
As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, John attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
A) As the former
B) The former
C) Former
D) She was
E) As the
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:59 pm
presumably John attended those 400 meetings and reviewed 700 apps while he held the office of a board member and the chair.

A, B, C all use "former chair"=> it would be difficult to attend that many meetings and review 700 apps while not holding the position of the chair.

D uses "she" with John

E. correct IMO, may be wrong though. John could have attended that many meetings and reviewed that many apps in the capacity of an active chair and board member only.

E?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 27 times

by karmayogi » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:20 am
A) As the former - Correctly used subordinate clause to qualify John, but fail on logical front. Nobody can attend meetings and do reviews as a FORMER chair.

B) The former - "The former chair" is subject and must followed by some verb to complete the sentence. It’s a case of sentence fragments.

C) Former – Has two problems. 1. Former should be preceded by some article. 2. After adding an article, this sentence will become similar to B.

D) She was – This is a case of comma splice.

E) As the – correct sentence. “As the” makes sentence before comma a subordinate clause, which qualifies John.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 27 times

by karmayogi » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:23 am
scoobydooby wrote: D uses "she" with John
Why John can't be a female? :) After all it's just a name.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 104 times

by scoobydooby » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:31 am
right karmayogi :) just knew D was wrong, the "she-john" jumped out!..the comma-splice thing didnt strike me :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by nasa » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:11 am
As much as John can be a female, so can a former chair and an active board member could have the previlege to attend 400 meetings and review 700 apps.

Logical fallacy does not seem to be the right reason to rule A a wrong choice.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:05 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by nasa » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:25 am
I guess the right reason to discard A is:
It is inappropriate to say
John is/was a former chairman for 18 years. It is implied that John is a former chairman forever after the moment he stepped out of his chairmanship.
OA is E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1