BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Putting

Expert replies
by Vemuri » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:25 pm
Are you having trouble getting the golf score you deserve? Is putting your pariah? The new Sweet Spot Putter is designed to improve your golf game overnight without intensive lessons. Even rank amateurs can dramatically increase their putting accuracy by 25%. You too can achieve a low golf score with the new Sweet Spot Putter.

Someone who accepted the reasoning in the advertisement above would be making which one of the following assumptions?

A. Without quality equipment, a golf player cannot improve his or her game.
B. The new Sweet Sport Putter will improve an amateur's game more than it will improve a professional's game.
C. The quality of a person's golf game is largely determined by the accuracy of his or her putting.
D. The new Sweet Spot Putter is superior to any other putter currently on the market.
E. Lessons are not as effective at improving the accuracy of a player's putting as is the use of quality equipment.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by cramya » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:35 pm
I think the last line of the argument should read "You too can achieve a high golf score". I dont play golf but would think a high score is directly proportional to how good a player is.

Anyways coming to the actual question.

I would go with C.

The argument takes a shift by first metioning a golf score and then moving on to putting(sweet spot putter). There must be something that connects the two.

Supported assumption being the quality of a person's golf game is largely determined by the accuracy of his or her putting.
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:50 pm
cramya wrote:I think the last line of the argument should read "You too can achieve a high golf score". I dont play golf but would think a high score is directly proportional to how good a player is.

Anyways coming to the actual question.

I would go with C.

The argument takes a shift by first metioning a golf score and then moving on to putting(sweet spot putter). There must be something that connects the two.

Supported assumption being the quality of a person's golf game is largely determined by the accuracy of his or her putting.
Thanks for your response cramya. I too don't play golf, but know just a few rules that allow me to watch the game when Tiger Woods is playing :-). The lesser the score the better player you are.

Anyway, coming back to the argument, why is D not an option? Don't you think C is a much more generic answer that does not connect the conclusion & the premise of the argument?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:55 pm
There goes my knowledge of GOLF. :roll:

I would negate D.

The new Sweet Spot Putter is NOT superior to any other putter currently on the market.

Does this weaken my conclusion? No it can still help the users achieve a low golf score.


There must be something that realtes golf score(quality) and putting and I feel C does that.

Whats the OA; hope I am not way off here?

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:02 pm
Nope !!! You were right on target. C is indeed the right answer.
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:46 am
I would go with option C
Join the discussion