BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pronoun basics?

Expert replies
by rishijhawar » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:35 pm
Hi, I have a query on Pronouns.

"Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which THEY allege give THEM the strength of cast iron". Source:Manhattan SC guide (latest edition, pg 62 of 302).

The guide says that Either pronoun could refer to researchers or to "nano-papers".

My take: There could be other grounds to reject the QUOTED sentence, but I disagree with what's said above on the ground that logic supersedes apparent pronoun ambiguity. Logically, to me, THEY can refer only to Researchers and certainly THEM can't refer to Researchers but only to "nano-papers".

Can you guys put your thoughts here? Tks

Also, I am illustrating some variants of the aforementioned sentence, could you guys evaluate if they are correct or not:

-Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which the Researchers allege give THEM the strength of cast iron.

-Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which THEY allege give the nano-papers the strength of cast iron.

-Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which the Researchers allege give the nano-papers the strength of cast iron.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rishijhawar » Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:44 pm
Hi friends, can someone please take a stab here.

rishijhawar wrote:Hi, I have a query on Pronouns.

"Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which THEY allege give THEM the strength of cast iron". Source:Manhattan SC guide (latest edition, pg 62 of 302).

The guide says that Either pronoun could refer to researchers or to "nano-papers".

My take: There could be other grounds to reject the QUOTED sentence, but I disagree with what's said above on the ground that logic supersedes apparent pronoun ambiguity. Logically, to me, THEY can refer only to Researchers and certainly THEM can't refer to Researchers but only to "nano-papers".

Can you guys put your thoughts here? Tks

Also, I am illustrating some variants of the aforementioned sentence, could you guys evaluate if they are correct or not:

-Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which the Researchers allege give THEM the strength of cast iron.

-Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which THEY allege give the nano-papers the strength of cast iron.

-Researchers claim to have developed new "nano-papers" incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which the Researchers allege give the nano-papers the strength of cast iron.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun May 06, 2012 12:40 pm
i received a private message regarding this thread.

the real problem with that sentence isn't the two individual pronouns; it's the combined use of both "they" and "them".

normally, if you're going to have a "they" and a "them" in the same clause (or 2 "they"s, or 2 "them"s), then both of them should refer to the same entity. basically, when you encounter the first pronoun, your brain makes a decision about who "they" are, in this particular clause, so that's the interpretation that will come immediately to mind if you encounter another "they"/"them". it creates this weird cognitive dissonance if you suddenly hit another "them" that stands for something else, even if there's only one word in the sentence that could logically make sense.

correspondingly, i think that your 2 sentences in which you've removed one of the pronouns and kept the other (your second and third example sentences) are fine.

--

the good news is that you won't have to make these kinds of decisions, individually, on the test.
remember that every issue you encounter is going to come in the context of a split -- i.e., it will be right up alongside other answer choices that do things differently. that will make these decisions a lot easier to make.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1