BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Product of all numbers is positive

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jose Ferreira » Mon May 04, 2009 12:37 pm
We want to know if the product of a certain set of integers is positive.

Statement 1 says that the product of the greatest and smallest numbers in the set is positive. That means that the greatest and smallest numbers are either both negative or both positive, and so the numbers in the set are either all positive or all negative.
So, if your set of numbers is {1, 2, 3, 5}, then the product is positive.
But if your set is {-3, -2, -1} then the product is negative.
Statement one is insufficient.

Statement 2 says that there is an even number of numbers in the set.
If your set is {2, 4, 5, 6} then the product is positive.
If your set is {-3, 4, 5, 6} then the product is negative.
Statement two is insufficient.

Put the statements together, and we see that two things must be true:
a) the highest and lowest number are BOTH positive or BOTH negative
AND
b) there is an even number of numbers in the set.

If the highest and lowest numbers are both positive, then all of the numbers in the set are positive, so the product will be positive.

If the highest and lowest are both negative, then all the numbers in the set are negative, so we just need to have an even number of them for the negatives in the product to "cancel out" and become positive.
For example: {-6, -5, -3, -1}

Any four negative numbers, or any even number of negative numbers, will always multiply to a positive product.

The answer is C.
Last edited by Jose Ferreira on Tue May 05, 2009 6:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jose Ferreira
Founder and CEO, Knewton, Inc.
https://www.knewton.com/gmat
Join the discussion

by V16 » Mon May 04, 2009 12:50 pm
Let me try:

IMO : E

Lets Rephrase the question : How many positive and how many negative numbers are there? ie., even/odd number of + and - integers.

St 1 says : greatest and smallest numbres are either positve or both negative but we dont know about the signs of othere numbers. So INSUFFICIENT.

St 2 says : list has even number of integers eg : list has only 2 or 4 or 6 or 8...integers. but here also we dont know signs of the integers. SO INSUFFICIENT.

If we combine st 1 & st 2 : greatest and smalles = positive/negative & list has even number of integers. lets say list has 6 numbers.

{1,2,3,4,5,6} = positive.
{1,2,3,4,-5,6} = negative.

so my take is E
Join the discussion