BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

problem with official answer

Expert replies
by ellexay » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:57 pm
Either interest rates or the supply of money can, along with the level of government spending, be factors contributing to the amount of monetary inflation.

a. can, along with the level of government spending, be factors contributing to

b. along with the level of government spending, can one or the other be contributing factors in

c. can, along with the level of government spending, contribute as factors to

d. can be a contributing factor to, along with the level of government spending

e. can contribute, along with the level of government spending, to



ANS: E.

The original sentence (A) is faulty in two respects. First, the sentence treats the compound subject (interest rates and the supply of money) as singular by using either . . . or; the predicate should agree by also referring to the subject in the singular form, using a factor rather than factors. Second, the verb phrase can . . . be is improperly split. Third, the phrase can . . . be factors contributing to is redundant and wordy. (E) remedies all the original sentence problems by uniting the verb parts, rewording the predicate to agree in form with the subject, and removing the redundant language.

I am scoring in the 96th percentile in Verbal, and I understand this explanation. However, I disagree with E because of the awkwardness of inserting "along with...spending" after "can contribute."

Any thoughts? Please help me see where I am wrong.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by shulapa » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:25 pm
Ellexay,

I can understand why do you see E as awkward. However, you should remember that you should go for the "best" answer among the given. As the rest of the possible answers are faulty, we are left with this only.

A. I would agree with your analysis of the plural use of factors as wrong, and that goes the same for B and C.
D. Is even more awkward as the ", along with ... spending" is not separated from the last part of sentence by another comma. Try reading the entire sentence with D in it.

Therefore, we are left with only E as a possible answer.

Can you please explain again why do you see a problem with the use of "Either" in the first sentence.

Eyal
Join the discussion

by ellexay » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:59 pm
Eyal,

Thanks for your assistance!

There isn't any reason why "either" is a bad choice in the original sentence, but "either or" signifies singular, rather than plural (i.e., "factors" should be "factor.").

I was going to pick E, but the awkwardness drove me crazy. I see how it is the "best" answer though.

-Ellen
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1