Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Problem Soving question : Similar question in ORG as well

Expert replies
by freedomfromIT » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:54 pm
Of 40 applicants for a job, 32 had at least
5 years of prior work experience, 24 had
advanced degrees, and 16 had at least
5 years of prior work experience and
advanced degrees. How many of the
applicants had neither 5 years of prior
work experience nor advanced degrees?
A. 0
B. 2
C. 4
D. 8
E.16

How do we go about soving this question .I have seen similar question in ORG 12 revsion PS 169 0r 167 .Can any one guide on this?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by DanaJ » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:34 pm
There are two traits attributed (or not) to members of a group of 40 people:
- at least 5 years of experience
- advanced degree

Those that have at least 5 years of experience are made up of those that either have or do not have an advanced degree. Since we know 16 people hold an advanced degree and have 5 years of work experience, then 16 peoplee (i.e. 32 - 16) have the experience but don't have a diploma.

Those that have a diploma can be categorized in people with or without the required experience. Again, since you have 16 people with both traits, then in this case you'll have 8 candidates (24 - 16) with an advanced degree, but without work experience.

So all this brings you to:
- 16 people with both
- 16 people with experience, but no advanced degree
- 8 people with an advanced degree, but no work experience
- x people with neither

x will of course be 40 - 16 - 16 - 8 = 0.

There are of course other ways of solving this without going through the mental reasoning outlined above, but I've always had trouble getting the formulas to stick to my brain, so i always double check... When you have a group of objects with two traits, a and b, then you will get that:

total = (objects with a) + (objects with b) - (objects with both) + (objects with neither a nor b)

In this case:

40 = 32 + 24 - 16 + x =40 + x ---- x = 0.
Last edited by DanaJ on Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by freedomfromIT » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:39 pm
Kewl!!!! Thanks fr such a prompt reply .Di u have a chnace to go thru the PS 169 in ORG 12 rev ..Both are similar.So this last shortcut helps in solving that as well?
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:43 pm
I don't have the OG 12, so I can't say I've looked at them. But I can tell you one thing: if they're similar to the problem above, then using this formula will surely provide the correct answer.
Join the discussion

by hetavdave » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:36 am
DanaJ,
I thinking i am making some some stupid mistake somewhere but I am unable to trace out where i am going wrong. My ans was 0.

Can you please help me on this?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion

by DanaJ » Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:11 am
hetavdave wrote:DanaJ,
I thinking i am making some some stupid mistake somewhere but I am unable to trace out where i am going wrong. My ans was 0.

Can you please help me on this?
Actually, it was I who was making the mistake. After analyzing your spreadsheet, I realized that I'd considered the number of people who hold a degree as 16 instead of 24 (just a mix-up - I didn't read the thing properly). The reasoning was still correct and the formula applies, but I'd get a wrong answer. Thanks for the heads up!
Join the discussion

by shanmugam.d » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:56 am
another way of tabulating (see the attached image):
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion