BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Problem Set CR

Expert replies
by gdk800 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:49 am
Stimulus: From 1976 to 1973, total US consumption of cigarettes increased 3.4 %, and total sales of chewing tobacco rose 18%. During the same period, total US population increased 5.0 %.

Question: If the above statements are true, which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn?

1) US manufacturers of tobacco products had higher profits in 1976 than in 1973.
2) Per capita consumption of cigarettes in the US was lower in 1976 than in 1973.
3) The proportion of non-smokers in US population dropped slightly between 1973 and 1976.
4) US manufacturers of tobacco products realize a lower profit on cigarettes than on chewing tobacco.
5) A large percentage of US smokers switched from cigarettes to chewing tobacco between 1973 and 1976.

OA is B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shovan85 » Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:38 pm
gdk800 wrote:Stimulus: From 1976 to 1973, total US consumption of cigarettes increased 3.4 %, and total sales of chewing tobacco rose 18%. During the same period, total US population increased 5.0 %.

Question: If the above statements are true, which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn?

OA is B
1) US manufacturers of tobacco products had higher profits in 1976 than in 1973.
We do not know the cost how can we talk about profit?

2) Per capita consumption of cigarettes in the US was lower in 1976 than in 1973.

3) The proportion of non-smokers in US population dropped slightly between 1973 and 1976.
We cannot say about non smokers. Regular smokers can vary the number of quantity of ciggs.

4) US manufacturers of tobacco products realize a lower profit on cigarettes than on chewing tobacco.
Again profit is out of discussion.

5) A large percentage of US smokers switched from cigarettes to chewing tobacco between 1973 and 1976.
quite possible any increase in tobacoo consumption is due to nonsmokers interest in tobacco. No guarantee of switching

Can be solved mathematically also :) ... Say

consumption of cigarettes in 1973 --> 1000 then in 1976 --> 1034
total sales of chewing tobacco in 1973 --> 1000 then in 1976 --> 1180
total US population in 1973 --> 100000 then in 1976 --> 105000

Per capita consumption cigarettes in 1973 = 1000/100000 = 0.0100
Per capita consumption cigarettes in 1976 = 1034/105000 = 0.0098
Per capita consumption tobacco in 1973 = 1000/100000 = 0.0100
Per capita consumption tobacco in 1976 = 1180/105000 = 0.0112
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by gdk800 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:47 pm
Thanks Shovan. I got the concept coz ur explanation was too good.
Join the discussion

by gdk800 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:01 am
Question: Which of the following best completes the passage below?
At a recent conference on environmental threats to the Noah Sea, most participating countries favored uniform controls on the quality of effluents, whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent. What must, of course, be shown, in order to avoid excessively restrictive controls, is that _____________.
(A) Any uniform controls that are adopted are likely to be implemented without delay
(B) Any substance to be made subject to controls can actually cause environmental damage
(C) The countries favoring uniform controls are those generating the largest quantities of effluents
(D) All of any given pollutant that is to be controlled actually reaches the North Sea at present
(E) Environmental damage already inflicted on the North Sea is reversible


The answer to the above question is B. The doubt I have is if we read the second line of stimulus that says "whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent" than when a source of affluent affects or doesn't affects the environment, how can the answer be B? In comparison, D is a much better choice to pick. Please explain.
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:26 am
B it is...simble...
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion