BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Problem on Multiples

Expert replies
by Uri » Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:50 am
Is m a multiple of 6?
(1) More than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 3.
(2) Fewer than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 12.

Official Answer: B

Please explain your methodology.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Problem on Multiples

by logitech » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:18 am
Is m a multiple of 6?
(1) More than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 3.

m 2m 3m 4m 5m

since more than 2 are multiples of 3, m is divisible with 3

3m is the first one so there has to be another 3 somewhere :)

But is M an even ? we dont know so it is divisible with 3 but not sure of 6

INSUF

(2) Fewer than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 12.

m 2m 3m 4m 5m

Fever than 2 = 1

so that would be m

m is a multiple of 12

so it is a multiple of 6

Choose B
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by 720dreaming » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:33 am
Couldn't fewer than 2=0?
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:36 am
I have following reasoning:

Let us take 9 : 9 18 27 36 45 more than 3 are multiples of 3, not a multiple of 6 though.

for 12: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 etc, more than 3 are multiple of 3 12 is a multiple of 3.

So A is out.

For B, though all example I can think of are negative, can one choose a number whose 0 or 1 multiple of the same are positive.

e.g. 15 is not 6 multiple and multiples are: 15 30 45 60 75, only 60 is a multiple of 12, and 15 is not a multiple of 6.

how to conclude there ae no such scenario where if at the most one is multiple of 12, it will have multiple of 6 too...

honestly, I would have choosen E in exam env's..
Join the discussion

Re: Problem on Multiples

by maihuna » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:38 am
logitech wrote:Is m a multiple of 6?
(1) More than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 3.

m 2m 3m 4m 5m

since more than 2 are multiples of 3, m is divisible with 3

3m is the first one so there has to be another 3 somewhere :)

But is M an even ? we dont know so it is divisible with 3 but not sure of 6

INSUF

(2) Fewer than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 12.

m 2m 3m 4m 5m

Fever than 2 = 1

so that would be m

m is a multiple of 12

so it is a multiple of 6

Choose B
See my above post, 15 doesn't hold on your explanation, you have given an reverse opposite it seems, can you put exact numerals supporting your claim.
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:47 am
I have decipher it correctly it seems, here follows the explanation:

A) I have already posted how two scenario are possible.

B) 6 has 2 and 3 as prime multiples,
If 1st five multiples contains at the most one multiple of 12 it will be: 2, 2 3

Pick a number and try to multiply it by 1 2 3 4 5, out of these a group of 6 will be possible with pairs of missing 3 only as 12 contains 2 2 3 and 6 requires 2 3 so a couple or more requires 2 3 2 3 that is pairs of 2's and 3's, but as it is saying out of the 1 2 3 4 5 only one multiple of 12 restricts our number or multiplier to 3 or 2

so any number will always lack a pair of 2 and 3 as otherwise we will get more than 2 multiples of 12, using either 3 or 2 and 4

So no number with 6 as a multiple can justify that. And so B says there are no such multiples of 6 ans is answer.
Join the discussion

Re: Problem on Multiples

by coffee5251 » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:50 am
logitech wrote: (2) Fewer than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 12.

m 2m 3m 4m 5m

Fever than 2 = 1

so that would be m

m is a multiple of 12

so it is a multiple of 6

Choose B
Hi, maybe I'm not understanding the question, but why does m have to be a multiple of 12? What if m is 6, then 4m is 24 which is a multiple of 12 and still satisifies the statement that only 1 number is a multiple of 12.

Could you explain this please? Thanks!
Join the discussion

Re: Problem on Multiples

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:43 pm
Uri wrote:Is m a multiple of 6?
(1) More than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 3.
(2) Fewer than 2 of the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are multiples of 12.

Please explain your methodology.


Statement (2) is sufficient, but it actually gives us a definite "NO" answer.

What if m=7? Then the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are:

7, 14, 21, 28, 35.

Fewer than 2 of those are multiples of 12, so it fits the rule. Is 7 a multiple of 6? NO.

We've got a "no", let's try to get a "yes".

if m=6, then the first 5 positive integer multiples of m are:

6, 12, 18, 24, 30.

2 of those are multiples of 12, so it violates the rule. Therefore, we CANNOT pick m=6.

if m=12, then the first 5 positive integer multiples of m will ALL be multiples of 12, so we clearly cannot pick m=12. Further, no multiple of 12 will be a permissible value for m.

In fact, we should be able to see that no multiple of 6 is permissible, since the first 5 multiples of m are:

m, 2m, 3m, 4m and 5m

and if m is a multiple of 6, both 2m and 4m will always be multiples of 12.

Therefore, if FEWER than 2 of the first 5 multiples of m are multiples of 12, m CANNOT be a multiple of 6: sufficient.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

Thanks!

by Uri » Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:16 am
Thanks all for participating. I feel the first part of the first post by maihuna coupled with the post of Stuart provides the right direction. Thanks once again to all!
Join the discussion