BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Probability

Expert replies
by crackgmat007 » Fri May 08, 2009 8:49 am
A box contains 10 light bulbs, fewer than half of which are defective. Two bulbs are to be drawn
simultaneously from the box. If n of the bulbs in box are defective, what is the value of n?
(1) The probability that the two bulbs to be drawn will be defective is 1/15.
(2) The probability that one of the bulbs to be drawn will be defective and the other will not
be defective is 7/15.

IMO - D. Since the probability is stated in each statement, I guessed each statement must be sufficient.

Can anyone help me compute the value of n? Tx
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by bluementor » Fri May 08, 2009 11:00 am
Since less than half are defective, so n<5.

Statement 1: Prob(2 defect bulbs) = 1/15

(n/10)*((n-1)/9) = 1/15
(n)(n-1) =6

the only possible value for n is 3. Sufficient.

Statement 2: Prob(1 defective, 1 not defective) = 7/15

Prob(1 defective, 1 not defective) = 7/15
2*(n/10)*((10-n)/9) = 7/15
(n)(10-n) = 21

here, n can be 7 or 3. but since n must be less than 5, the only possible value for n is 3. Sufficient.

Choose D.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Fri May 08, 2009 11:18 am
I have a question. In Statement 2. Why did you multiply the probability by 2? Is it because there can be two ways of getting 1 defective and other not defective? Pls clarify. Tx.

Statement 2: Prob(1 defective, 1 not defective) = 7/15

Prob(1 defective, 1 not defective) = 7/15
2*(n/10)*((10-n)/9) = 7/15
(n)(10-n) = 21
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Fri May 08, 2009 12:34 pm
crackgmat007 wrote:I have a question. In Statement 2. Why did you multiply the probability by 2? Is it because there can be two ways of getting 1 defective and other not defective? Pls clarify. Tx.

Statement 2: Prob(1 defective, 1 not defective) = 7/15

Prob(1 defective, 1 not defective) = 7/15
2*(n/10)*((10-n)/9) = 7/15
(n)(10-n) = 21
because it can be the first one or the second one that is defective.

it can be:

(n/10) * (10-n)/9 = 7/15


and

(10-n)/10 * n/9 = 7/15


So you have to add these two together. (They give they same result so he just multiplied one of them by 2).
Join the discussion