Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Princeton SC - Clause and Connectors

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Sat May 26, 2012 1:55 pm
The Cold War, an apt name for the nervous post-World War II relations between the superpowers, prompted families to build bomb shelters costing thousands of dollars but fortunately were never used.


families to build bomb shelters costing thousands of dollars but


families to invest in bomb shelters that would cost thousands of dollars and that


families to invest thousands of dollars in bomb shelters that


the building by families of bomb shelters costing thousands of dollars that


the building of bomb shelters by families that cost thousands of dollars but
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by patanjali.purpose » Sat May 26, 2012 2:39 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:The Cold War, an apt name for the nervous post-World War II relations between the superpowers, prompted families to build bomb shelters costing thousands of dollars but fortunately were never used.


families to build bomb shelters costing thousands of dollars but
X (bomb shelters) BUT Y (..were never used) are not parallel

families to invest in bomb shelters that would cost thousands of dollars and that
use of WOULD signifies BUILDING of SHELTERS will happen in future (unlike the intended meaning that building was already built in past); use of AND THAT appears a better option but IMO use of THAT WOULD COST....AND THAT ..WERE is not appropriate; WOULD COST = FUTURE but WERE = PAST - HOW come USE OF SHELTERS WERE USED IN PAST WHEN THEY ARE STILL NOT BUILT


families to invest thousands of dollars in bomb shelters that
IMO C; use of THAT near BOMB SHELTERS avoid any possible ambiguity


the building by families of bomb shelters costing thousands of dollars that
families of bomb shelters (incorrect phrase); WHAT does THAT refer - BOMB SHELTERS or thousands of dollars, making the choice ambiguous


the building of bomb shelters by families that cost thousands of dollars but

not sure WHAT is the subject of "WERE NEVER USED". If BOMB SHELTERS is subject, then we have a parallelism problem: X (bomb shelters) BUT Y (..were never used) are not parallel;

IMO C
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Sat May 26, 2012 3:41 pm
A. No. Meaning. You need to use "that" instead of "but" at the end of this phrase to clarify what "fortunately were never used" refers to.

B. No. Verb tense. This answer choice changes the verb from "costing" to "would cost" – "would cost" is future tense and implies that the families had not yet spent the money, but according to the sentence they had spent the money on building the shelters.

C. Yes. Meaning. Without the "that," it is unclear what the phrase "fortunately were never used" refers to. It is the shelters that fortunately were never used, and this answer choice makes that clear.

D. No. Style. "The building by families" is unnecessary. Answer choice (C) is much better.

E. No. Meaning. This answer choice makes it sound like the families cost thousands of dollars.
Join the discussion

by agarwalva » Sat May 26, 2012 6:10 pm
IMO C
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sat May 26, 2012 10:14 pm
IMO: C
Join the discussion