BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Princeton Review sample test

Expert replies
by tzurohad » Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:56 am
Hey guys and gals,

from what I've heard and from the topics I read here, the PR sample test is suppose to be a bit easier...
I did it a couple of hours ago and was stunned when the score appeared - 40Q 26V.

the average of my GMATPREP and powerprep is 47Q 31V. as I reviewed the statistics it appears that I had the least incorrect answers on the PR test (9Q 12V)...UUHHH!!

Is the scoring method different? can someone evaluate what should be my real score?

thanks and Shalom from Israel
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by mayonnai5e » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:02 pm
The scoring methods are different, and I don't think anyone can directly translate from one to the next since both use different implementations of a general CAT algorithm.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/my-blog-erro ... t4899.html
550 =\ ...560 =\... 650 =) ...570 =( ...540 =*( ...680 =P ... 670 =T ...=T... 650 =T ...700 =) ..690 =) ...710 =D ...GMAT 720 DING!! ;D

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by tzurohad » Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:15 pm
Thanks man,

still I find it wierd that I got such a low score on the PR... again, with minimal mistakes (in compare to my other tests).
Join the discussion