BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Princeton Review Cracking The GMAT 2009 Math Bins any good?

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by virtuoso902 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:53 pm
I used the PR book to familiarize myself with the GMAT as a whole. I'm thinking about starting off my Quant learning process with some practice from the Math Bins in the back. They said I should start in Math Bin 2 (should i start in Bin 1? Should i just skip PR's bins in general?)

From my PR SAT prep (ages ago) and from what I've gathered reading the Cracking the GMAT Book. I have noticed that Princeton Review focuses too much on little cheats and hacks such as plugging in and joe bloggs (they are useful from time to time but PR seems like they really go overboard with this, correct me if i'm wrong). Is it ok to develop this way of thinking from the answer explanations that they give.

Is my time better spent doing something else? I wanted to get a more complete math review before I started on the MGMAT books to really zero in on my weak spots and plug those wholes up.

Thanks!!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |