BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

PRINCESTONE-TEACHER

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:21 am
In an effort to retain more highly-qualified teachers in the public school system, many school districts have begun a tuition-credit program with their teachers. Such programs allow a teacher to increase his qualifications by earning a master's degree at a substantial savings. The school district pays for the teacher's tuition up front, and the teacher agrees to pay back one-half of the total cost over the course of his first five years of employment with the school district after completion of the master's program. The teacher is obligated to reimburse the district fully, however, if he chooses to leave the district before the five-year period has elapsed.

The tuition-credit program described above is based on which one of the following assumptions?



A legally binding agreement will morally oblige most teachers to fulfill their side of the bargain.



The deterrent of having to reimburse the district fully will encourage teachers to remain in the employ of the district for at least five years.



The financial burden taken on by most teachers who finance postgraduate education themselves is less onerous than the negative effect of a five-year teaching commitment.



Most teachers who take part in the program will have to be persuaded to remain in the employ of the district through financial and other means.



The program will discourage teachers from pursuing advanced degrees.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by albatross86 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:33 am
Program will pay for the teacher's tuition which the teacher will then pay half of over 5 years or return in full if they quit before 5 years.

ASSUMPTION?

A. The legal and moral side of it is separate.

B. Yes. It assumes that the liability of quitting before 5 years will discourage teachers from doing so.

C. This is the opposite of what is actually hoped for. The 5 year commitment + 50% savings on tuition should be attractive to the teachers as compared to taking on the PG costs themselves.

D. The program is itself financially and legally constricting, no other persuasion is needed.

E. Wrong, it's meant to encourage them to do so and to stay.


Pick B.
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide
Join the discussion

by outreach » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:21 am
+1 for B
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:26 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:In an effort to retain more highly-qualified teachers in the public school system, many school districts have begun a tuition-credit program with their teachers. Such programs allow a teacher to increase his qualifications by earning a master's degree at a substantial savings. The school district pays for the teacher's tuition up front, and the teacher agrees to pay back one-half of the total cost over the course of his first five years of employment with the school district after completion of the master's program. The teacher is obligated to reimburse the district fully, however, if he chooses to leave the district before the five-year period has elapsed.

The tuition-credit program described above is based on which one of the following assumptions?



A legally binding agreement will morally oblige most teachers to fulfill their side of the bargain.



The deterrent of having to reimburse the district fully will encourage teachers to remain in the employ of the district for at least five years.



The financial burden taken on by most teachers who finance postgraduate education themselves is less onerous than the negative effect of a five-year teaching commitment.



Most teachers who take part in the program will have to be persuaded to remain in the employ of the district through financial and other means.



The program will discourage teachers from pursuing advanced degrees.
I am not sure if the intended meaning of question is construed properly!!

SOurce??
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:38 pm
source is princestone online test on cr. question is correct no doubt in that . i just copy and paste.

oa is b
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:38 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:source is princestone online test on cr. question is correct no doubt in that . i just copy and paste.

oa is b
@pradeep bhai,

Plz se the link..I think there is a issue with question itself..

https://www.beatthegmat.com/automobile-m ... 59986.html
Join the discussion

by albatross86 » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:15 pm
gmatmachoman wrote:
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:source is princestone online test on cr. question is correct no doubt in that . i just copy and paste.

oa is b
@pradeep bhai,

Plz se the link..I think there is a issue with question itself..

https://www.beatthegmat.com/automobile-m ... 59986.html
Isn't that a different question? :)
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide
Join the discussion