BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PRINCESTONE-rc

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:17 am
The Bering Land Bridge, or Beringia,
emerged in the Bering and Chukchi
Seas following a gradual drop in sea
level during the Quaternary period (the
5 last 2 million years). About 20,000 years
ago the land bridge extended from
Unalaska Island of the Aleutian chain on
the southeast, and from near the mouth
of the Mackenzie River of Canada on
10 the east to near the Kolyma and
Indigirka rivers of eastern Siberia on the
west, and northwestward to Cape
Olyutorsky of the Koryak area north of
the Kamchatka Peninsula.
15 Archaeologists believe that the first
humans to penetrate North America
used this bridge, migrating from
northeast Asia to northwestern Canada.
This migration probably occurred during
20 the last major phase of the Wisconsin
glaciation, a period that began
approximately 30,000 years ago and
lasted approximately 20,000 years. As
this period ended, the two continents
25 were separated as major continental ice
sheets and other glaciers melted and
caused the sea level to rise again.
When the bridge existed, much of the
area was not glaciated; it supported
30 Arctic vegetation, particularly tundra, dry
grasslands, marsh vegetation, and
boreal forests. These plants supplied
ample food for grazing animals,
including horses, reindeer, and such Ice
35 Age species as mammoths, mastodons,
and woolly rhinoceros. The presence of
fish and bird fossils points to the
possibility that Beringia could have
supported human communities.



The author's argument in the second paragraph would be most supported by the discovery of



a 20,000-year-old, undersized mammoth skeleton on the Kamchatka Peninsula



18,000-year-old cave drawings depicting humans and animals near the Mackenzie River



fossilized vegetation at Cape Olyutorsky that may have been part of the mammoth's diet



a 35,000-year-old reindeer skeleton near the Kolyma River



similar 20,000-year-old human skeletons on Unalaska Island and at Cape Olyutorsky
Last edited by pradeepkaushal9518 on Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by Haaress » Sun Jul 04, 2010 1:45 pm
The piece seems to be a one paragraphed passage. Please separate the paragraphs so that we could attempt the question. Thanks!
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:16 pm
Is the answer D

Thanks,
Viju
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:34 am
IMO -- E
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by singhpreet1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:11 pm
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:The Bering Land Bridge, or Beringia,
emerged in the Bering and Chukchi
Seas following a gradual drop in sea
level during the Quaternary period (the
5 last 2 million years). About 20,000 years
ago the land bridge extended from
Unalaska Island of the Aleutian chain on
the southeast, and from near the mouth
of the Mackenzie River of Canada on
10 the east to near the Kolyma and
Indigirka rivers of eastern Siberia on the
west, and northwestward to Cape
Olyutorsky of the Koryak area north of
the Kamchatka Peninsula.
15 Archaeologists believe that the first
humans to penetrate North America
used this bridge, migrating from
northeast Asia to northwestern Canada.
This migration probably occurred during
20 the last major phase of the Wisconsin
glaciation, a period that began
approximately 30,000 years ago and
lasted approximately 20,000 years. As
this period ended, the two continents
25 were separated as major continental ice
sheets and other glaciers melted and
caused the sea level to rise again.
When the bridge existed, much of the
area was not glaciated; it supported
30 Arctic vegetation, particularly tundra, dry
grasslands, marsh vegetation, and
boreal forests. These plants supplied
ample food for grazing animals,
including horses, reindeer, and such Ice
35 Age species as mammoths, mastodons,
and woolly rhinoceros. The presence of
fish and bird fossils points to the
possibility that Beringia could have
supported human communities.



The author's argument in the second paragraph would be most supported by the discovery of



a 20,000-year-old, undersized mammoth skeleton on the Kamchatka Peninsula



18,000-year-old cave drawings depicting humans and animals near the Mackenzie River



fossilized vegetation at Cape Olyutorsky that may have been part of the mammoth's diet



a 35,000-year-old reindeer skeleton near the Kolyma River



similar 20,000-year-old human skeletons on Unalaska Island and at Cape Olyutorsky
i feel it is E as well... we cannot be certain about D as it only mentions the same for 30000 years, but we do not know how things could have changed in the 5000 years prior to that. E is more convincing as we are talking of the time frame of 20000 years in the second paragraph.

though i might be wrong...what is the OA?

Preet
Join the discussion

by siddus » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:51 am
I think A,B,C and partly D are all wrong for the same reason - They prove that a phenomenon indicating human presence occurred but not in the actual land bridge area but in the several (oddly named) regions connected by the bridge. Also D says 35K years ago which is disputable because the extension happened 20K years ago.

E clearly proves that the bridge existed because it was used by related humanoids to cross from one region (Unalaska) to another (Cape Olyutorsky) connected by the bridge.
Join the discussion