BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

prime number

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:23 pm
First consider (1) alone.
x<10.
For x = 1, 2, 3, 4 the values of x! + (x + 1) are 2, 5, 10, 29 respectively.
Out of these, 3 are prime and 1 is not prime.
Or (1) alone is not sufficient.
Next consider (2) alone.
For x = 2, 4, 6, 8 the values of x! + (x + 1) are 5, 29, 727, 8!+9.
The first 3 are prime but 8! + 9 will not be a prime because it will be divisible by 9.
Again nothing definite can be said.
So even (2) alone is not sufficient.
On combining we can check again with same values of 2, 4, 6 and 8 and get the same result that nothing definite can be said .
The correct answer is E.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Laura GMAT Tutor » Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:37 am
Rahul's explanation is great. :) But I wanted to throw in something else...

He said that "8! + 9" will be divisible by 9, and I just wanted to clarify why that was, in case anyone was wondering.

First, of course, 8! is (8)(7)(6)(5)(4)(3)(2)(1). Will 8! be a multiple of 9? Absolutely! It has a 6 and a 3, meaning that it has two 3s in its prime factor list. Since 8! must be a multiple of 9, 8!+9 must also be a multiple of 9. So it can't be prime.
follow me on twitter! :)
@LauraGMATtutor

or visit my blog:
https://realusefulgmat.blocked/
Join the discussion

by rishab1988 » Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:32 pm
great explanation guys
Join the discussion