BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prime lending rates went up

Expert replies
by minar » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:49 am
When the prime lending rates went up 1987, economists determined they would cause interest rates to rise and then decline over the ensuing five-year period.

A)
B) they would mean that interest rates would rise and then decline
C) that they would cause interest rates to rise and then decline
D) that the increase would cause interest rates to rise and then decline
E) that the increase would cause interest rates' rising and subsequent declining

Source: 1000 SC series (923)

OA: D

According to my understanding:
A, B, & C can be eliminated because the antecedent for 'they' is not clear.
D sounds great, but what is the problem with E? Is it because of the idiom: X causes Y to occur?

Please clarify...
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by aspirant2011 » Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:59 am
In E use of subsequent is wrong as it should have been subsequently.........moreover it seems from the language in E that interest rates would themselves rise and decline though the original sentence intends to say that the increase would cause interest rates to rise.............
Join the discussion

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Mon Feb 28, 2011 3:11 pm
Hey guys,

Great question, and one thing I'd encourage you to do is to consider logic before deferring to "unidiomatic". "Idiomatic" basically just means "that's just the way it is" (cue the Bruce Hornsby single...) and since that's not as easily definable on so many questions, if you can find a logical reason that something is wrong (or not wrong), that's a much more universal strategy.

Here, E is illogical - "rising" and "declining" are used as nouns (note that "interest rates'..." with the possessive makes "rates" an adjective, describing "rising"). Do interest rates really own, or possess, "rising"? It's a whole lot more logical if the verb is used, and it's also a lot cleaner and more concise. So D has those advantages - logic and concision - over E. And since there's a way to replicate that search ("does it make logical sense?" "Is it clear?" "Is it unduly wordy and long?"), I'd recommend thinking that way before just noting "idiom".
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Join the discussion

by minar » Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:30 pm
aspirant2011, thanks!

Brian@VeritasPrep: very impressive explanation. much appreciated.
Join the discussion

by Bakhtior » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:14 am
In E use of subsequent is wrong as it should have been subsequently.........moreover it seems from the language in E that interest rates would themselves rise and decline though the original sentence intends to say that the increase would cause interest rates to rise.............

rising and declining are gerund, that's why subsequent is true.

IMO D
Join the discussion

by EducationAisle » Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:01 am
minar wrote: According to my understanding:
A, B, & C can be eliminated because the antecedent for 'they' is not clear.

One important thing to note in this sentence.

What does they refer to? Even if they referred to prime lending rates, it would still not make sense in A, B and C. This is because prime lending rates are not causing interest rates to rise and decline; the increase in prime lending rates is causing interest rates to rise and decline. This is not clear at all in A, B and C. This is also a very prominent reason why A, B and C are not correct.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi
Join the discussion

by minar » Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:18 am
Many thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1