BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Pretzel

Expert replies
by greenwich » Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:45 pm
Pretzel vendor: The new license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside the art museum is prohibitively expensive. Charging typical prices, a vendor would need to sell an average of 25 pretzels per hour to break even. At my stand outside city hall, I average only 15 per hour. Therefore, I could not break even running a pretzel stand outside the art museum, much less turn a profit.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the pretzel vendor's argument?

(A) There is currently no license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside city hall.
(B) Pretzel vendors who operate stands outside the art museum were making a profit before the imposition of the new license fee.
(C) The number of pretzel stands outside the art museum is no greater than the number of pretzel stands now outside city hall.
(D) People who buy pretzels at pretzel stands are most likely to do so during the hours at which the art museum is open to the public.
(E) Fewer people passing the art museum than passing city hall are likely to buy pretzels.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:23 pm
HI greenwich,

For this CR prompt, we need to understand the pretzel vendor's logic, then find an answer that strengthens it.

The Facts:
-The new license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside the museum is expensive.
-Charging typical prices, a vendor needs to sell 25 pretzels/hr. just to break even.
-Outside city hall, the vendor averages just 15 pretzels/hr.

The Conclusion:
-The vendor could not break even running a stand at the museum, must less turn a profit.

The Logic:
The pretzel vendor is comparing the "situation" at the museum to the "situation" at city hall. Assuming all of the other variables (potential customers, cost of supplies, competition, etc.) are the same, then the vendor has a solid argument. To strengthen that argument, we either need an answer that confirms everything the vendor assumes OR that points out that the situation is even worse than the vendor thinks it would be.

Answer E describes how the situation would be even worse because the potential customer base would be even lower than what the vendor sees at city hall.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by greenwich » Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:30 am
[email protected] wrote:HI greenwich,

For this CR prompt, we need to understand the pretzel vendor's logic, then find an answer that strengthens it.

The Facts:
-The new license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside the museum is expensive.
-Charging typical prices, a vendor needs to sell 25 pretzels/hr. just to break even.
-Outside city hall, the vendor averages just 15 pretzels/hr.

The Conclusion:
-The vendor could not break even running a stand at the museum, must less turn a profit.

The Logic:
The pretzel vendor is comparing the "situation" at the museum to the "situation" at city hall. Assuming all of the other variables (potential customers, cost of supplies, competition, etc.) are the same, then the vendor has a solid argument. To strengthen that argument, we either need an answer that confirms everything the vendor assumes OR that points out that the situation is even worse than the vendor thinks it would be.

Answer E describes how the situation would be even worse because the potential customer base would be even lower than what the vendor sees at city hall.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Thanks Rich, could you explain why C is wrong?
Join the discussion

by greenwich » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:57 pm
Anyone? What's wrong with C?
Join the discussion

by BTGmoderatorAT » Fri Sep 08, 2017 7:56 am
People who go to the Art Museum are more likely to be the potential customers as they are mostly tourists and students, whereas people who go to the City Hall have Business purposes.Does this argument makes sense?
Join the discussion

by rsarashi » Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:45 am
[email protected] wrote:HI greenwich,

For this CR prompt, we need to understand the pretzel vendor's logic, then find an answer that strengthens it.

The Facts:
-The new license fee for operating a pretzel stand outside the museum is expensive.
-Charging typical prices, a vendor needs to sell 25 pretzels/hr. just to break even.
-Outside city hall, the vendor averages just 15 pretzels/hr.

The Conclusion:
-The vendor could not break even running a stand at the museum, must less turn a profit.

The Logic:
The pretzel vendor is comparing the "situation" at the museum to the "situation" at city hall. Assuming all of the other variables (potential customers, cost of supplies, competition, etc.) are the same, then the vendor has a solid argument. To strengthen that argument, we either need an answer that confirms everything the vendor assumes OR that points out that the situation is even worse than the vendor thinks it would be.

Answer E describes how the situation would be even worse because the potential customer base would be even lower than what the vendor sees at city hall.
Hi Rich ,

Can you please explain that why D is wrong?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 08, 2017 1:10 pm
rsarashi wrote:Can you please explain that why D is wrong?
D: People who buy pretzels at pretzel stands are most likely to do so during the hours at which the art museum is open to the public.
Here, it is possible that the people who buy pretzels when the museum is open will purchase far more than 25 pretzels per hour, WEAKENING the conclusion that the vendor will not be able to earn a profit.
Since the correct answer choice must STRENGTHEN the conclusion, eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion