-
breaktheGMATwall
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 3:44 pm
Looking at OG 12 SC#38
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women's property laws.
Not able to understand why we can't use
arguing in a treatise ?
options B states
arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women -
from what I understand
present participle can be used when two actions are happening at the same time.
as in X published y, arguing Z
is this understanding incorrect or is the formation " arguing in treatise "not correct ?
In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women's property laws.
Not able to understand why we can't use
arguing in a treatise ?
options B states
arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women -
from what I understand
present participle can be used when two actions are happening at the same time.
as in X published y, arguing Z
is this understanding incorrect or is the formation " arguing in treatise "not correct ?












