Please help me in solving these SC question taken from OG12

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:29 pm
Thanked: 4 times
17. The commission has directed advertisers to
restrict the use of the word "natural" to foods that
do not contain color or flavor additives, chemical
preservatives, or nothing that has been synthesized.
(A) or nothing that has been
(B) or that has been
(C) and nothing that is
(D) or anything that has been
(E) and anything

31.Unlike the conviction held by many of her colleagues
that genes were relatively simple and static, Barbara
McClintock adhered to her own more complicated
ideas about how genes might operate, and in 1983,
at the age of 81, was awarded a Nobel Prize for her
discovery that the genes in corn are capable of
moving from one chromosomal site to another.
(A) Unlike the conviction held by many of her
colleagues that genes were
(B) Although many of her colleagues were of the
conviction of genes being
(C) Contrary to many of her colleagues being
convinced that genes were
(D) Even though many of her colleagues were
convinced that genes were
(E) Even with many of her colleagues convinced of
genes being

38)In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women's property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political
and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political
and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and
legal rights for women

Please help me how you have identified and eliminated the errors....Thank you...
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Tue Apr 26, 2011 8:20 am
Hi Nandy!

If you do a google search first, you'll find most OG12 questions have already been discussed around the web, and/or here on Beat the GMAT. :-) To get a greater response from the board, it's best to limit one question per post.

For #17:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/and-or-quest ... ent=Boston

https://www.beatthegmat.com/using-and-vs-or-t46248.html

https://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... isers.html

For #31:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/appropriate- ... t3938.html

https://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... ntock.html

For #38:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/women-rights-t15900.html

https://www.beatthegmat.com/in-1850-lucr ... 59869.html

Hope this helps!
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:14 am

by VINJAY » Tue May 03, 2011 3:27 am
Hi Vivian,

In the following question: why is option B wrong?

38)In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on
Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights and for changes in the
married women's property laws.
(A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal
political and legal rights
(B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal
rights for women
(C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political
and legal rights
(D) a treatise advocating women's equal political
and legal rights
(E) a treatise that argued for equal political and
legal rights for women

Is it probably because it is wrong to introduce a prep. phrase "in a ..." within the idiom "argue for"

Otherwise, B can be correct given that the present participle arguing modifies the first clause to Lucretia...

Thanks in advance

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue May 03, 2011 10:51 am
Hi Vivian , Although i agree that making use of threads already exiting on the forum will bring out the maximum response from people, i dont find any substantial reasons for eliminating the incorrect answers for the second question #31 . The only post that lists down the reasons for eliminating has been posted by one Komal and even she has eliminated most of the choices on grounds of awkwordness.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue May 03, 2011 11:20 am
Hi ,
Could an expert please explain why in the 3rd question ie 38 the OA is E
Though E is the best option available , the past tense "argued " seems to convey that the treatise argued way back in 1850 and has not argued since then .
Whats wrong with B.
The -ing modifier modifies the entire clause i.e subject and verb .Then why is B wrong . Is it because of "it says in the treatise "
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue May 03, 2011 1:20 pm
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women's property laws.

A.arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
B.arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
C.a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights
D.a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights
E.a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
In A, it is unclear whether for women and for changes are adjectives modifying a treatise (a treatise for women...and for changes) or adverbs modifying arguing (arguing...for women...and for changes). It must be clear what a modifier is modifying. Eliminate A.

In B, it is unclear whether for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes are adjectives modifying a treatise (a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes) or adverbs modifying arguing (arguing...for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes). It must be clear what a modifier is modifying. Eliminate B.

In C, a treatise that advocates...rights...and for changes is not parallel. Eliminate C.

In D, a treatise advocating...rights and for changes is not parallel. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue May 03, 2011 1:42 pm
thanks gmatguruny for pointing out my mistake . i didnt analyse options a.b wll
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by Spidy001 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:44 am
GMATGuruNY,

Good analysis on options A and B. Have a question for you.

E.a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

in option E, how can we be sure what prepositional phrase "for women " is modifying ? is this modifying equal political and legal rights or argued.

Please explain.

GMATGuruNY wrote:
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women's property laws.

A.arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
B.arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
C.a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights
D.a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights
E.a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women
In A, it is unclear whether for women and for changes are adjectives modifying a treatise (a treatise for women...and for changes) or adverbs modifying arguing (arguing...for women...and for changes). It must be clear what a modifier is modifying. Eliminate A.

In B, it is unclear whether for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes are adjectives modifying a treatise (a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes) or adverbs modifying arguing (arguing...for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes). It must be clear what a modifier is modifying. Eliminate B.

In C, a treatise that advocates...rights...and for changes is not parallel. Eliminate C.

In D, a treatise advocating...rights and for changes is not parallel. Eliminate D.

The correct answer is E.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by Spidy001 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:50 am
GMATGuruNY,

I think i got it now. for equal political ***** and for changes**** are acting as adverbs modifying argued.

Hence in phrase for equal political and legal rights for women ,
for women
is modifying
equal political and legal rights
, not
argued
.

correct me if am wrong.

Thanks

• Page 1 of 1