BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Preptest Maths DS

Expert replies
by kvcpk » Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:35 am
If the integer n is greater than 1, is n equal to 2?

(1) n has exactly two positive factors

(2)The difference of any two positive factors of n is odd.

OA is B

Please explain me how second statement alone is sufficient?

Let n be 12. it has 3,4 as factors. difference of 3,4 is odd.
Let n be 2, it has two factors 2,1.
2-1 =1 is also odd.
So for the same premise we are getting 2 answers(yes and No). Hence it is insufficient.

What is the mistake i am making?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by albatross86 » Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:55 am
"The difference of ANY two positive factors of n is odd"

Remember, any two.

This means that if you were testing, say 12:

12 has the factors : 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12

If you pick 1 and 3, or 3 and 12, you will get even differences. So (2) is violated.

Only an ( Even - Odd ) or ( Odd - Even ) can give you an Odd difference. This is an important number property for you to know.

This means that n has only 1 even and 1 odd factor, since if it had more than 1 of either of them you could pick 2 of the kind and get an even difference.

This is only true of the number 2 which has factors 1 and 2. Difference = 1

Hope that clears your doubt!
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu Jun 10, 2010 11:01 am
Hi kvcpk,

Is n=2?

1) exactly 2 factors --> n is prime. Could be 2, but could also be 3. NOT SUFFICIENT
2) Any two factors of n must have an odd difference:
  • n cannot be odd because two of its factors (n and 1) would have an even difference.
  • n cannot be an even greater than 2 because two if its factors (n and 2) would have an even difference.
  • n must be 2, because the difference between its only 2 factors (2 and 1) would be odd.
n=2. SUFFICIENT
[spoiler]
The answer is B[/spoiler]. A more detailed solution as well as a step by step video solution can be found at GMATPrep question 1017. Use the Drill Engine to generate similar questions in a timed drill. Set topic='Number Properties' and difficulty='700+'
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:07 pm
Patrick & albatross86

Thanks for the explanation. I understand it now. Was looking at the seond premise in a wrong way.

Praveen
Join the discussion