BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prep test qn. - Pls explain

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Prep test qn. - Pls explain

by aim-wsc » Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:16 pm
pavithra wrote:Hi

I got this qn. in MGMAT prep test


Is x > y?

(1) sq.rt (x) > y

(2) x^3 > y

The answer is C. Could someone explain the solution pls? (I don't understand the explanation by MGMAT)

Thanks

Pavithra
1) for sq rt (x) >y
is alone not sufficient since sq rt can be of -ve value also:
for example: x=4 & y=1 then
sq rt (x) = +/- 2
Insufficient.

2) for x^3 >y
is alone again makes trouble when we take values of x less than and more than one... eg take x=0.2 or x=2
NO issues with -ve +ve since the sign of the cube of any number remains same as the original number's.

so when you combine both statement you get exact idea of number whether it is +ve or -ve and more than 1 or in fraction.
Join the discussion

by ash g » Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:27 am
All,
sorry, reopening an old question but did not understand the explanation below.

1) for sq rt (x) >y
is alone not sufficient since sq rt can be of -ve value also:
for example: x=4 & y=1 then
sq rt (x) = +/- 2
Insufficient.


So if both +2 and -2 are greater than y implies y less than -2 and less than x.
I must be missing something very simple here...but i think answer should be A.

Thx,
Ash
Join the discussion

by smkrn » Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:52 am
ash g wrote:All,
sorry, reopening an old question but did not understand the explanation below.

1) for sq rt (x) >y
is alone not sufficient since sq rt can be of -ve value also:
for example: x=4 & y=1 then
sq rt (x) = +/- 2
Insufficient.


So if both +2 and -2 are greater than y implies y less than -2 and less than x.
I must be missing something very simple here...but i think answer should be A.

Thx,
Ash
I think the problem with part 1) is that sqrt(x) could be larger or smaller than 1.

For example, if sqrt(x)=0.2 and y=0.1, then sqrt(x) is greater than y but x=.04 is less than y. However if sqrt(x)=2 and y=1, sqrt(x) is greater than y and x=4 is greater than y. So part 1) is not sufficient by itself. Hopefully this makes sense.
Join the discussion

by ash g » Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:59 am
Valid. Many thanks. I just got caught up in the 4 & 1 example that I forgot about using fractions.
Regards,
Ash
Join the discussion