BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

prep questions

Expert replies
by jc114 » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:12 am
If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

A. ..

B. Were the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet.

C. Was the ice of Greenland and Antarctica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet or more.

D. If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica was melting, the sea level would rise at 100 feet.

E. Should the ice of Greenland and Antarctica melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

==> wouldn't A be appropriate over B?

Britain cut its base lending rate to its lowest level in 22 years, giving a boost of confidence to investors and it signaled that the European rates will continue to move down even as they move up in the United States.



A. ..

B. investors and signaling that the rates would continue to move down in Europe even as they move up

C. investors, which signaled that the rates in Europe would continue to move down despite the fact of their moving

D. investors, and it signaled that European rates would continue to move down in spite of their moving

E. investors, signaling that the rates in Europe will continue to move down just as they move up

==> I had a difficult time choosing btn B and E (which is wrong), but in E, wouldn't.."signaling..." be appropriate to indicate a cause and effect? (because they cut the lending rate, as a result, it signaled..."
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: prep questions

by jayhawk2001 » Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:45 pm
jc114 wrote:If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.
A. ..
B. Were the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet.
C. Was the ice of Greenland and Antarctica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet or more.
D. If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica was melting, the sea level would rise at 100 feet.
E. Should the ice of Greenland and Antarctica melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

==> wouldn't A be appropriate over B?
Atleast 100 feet is good enough -- the extra "or more" is unnecessarily
wordy. Hence B would be preferred over A

jc114 wrote: Britain cut its base lending rate to its lowest level in 22 years, giving a boost of confidence to investors and it signaled that the European rates will continue to move down even as they move up in the United States.

A. ..
B. investors and signaling that the rates would continue to move down in Europe even as they move up
C. investors, which signaled that the rates in Europe would continue to move down despite the fact of their moving
D. investors, and it signaled that European rates would continue to move down in spite of their moving
E. investors, signaling that the rates in Europe will continue to move down just as they move up

==> I had a difficult time choosing btn B and E (which is wrong), but in E, wouldn't.."signaling..." be appropriate to indicate a cause and effect? (because they cut the lending rate, as a result, it signaled..."
The cut in base lending rate does 2 things -- giving boost of confidence
to investors AND signaling that rates will go down.

B correctly uses AND to denote this parallel structure.

E incorrectly links the 2 clauses and leads to confusion -- is the
signaling a result of the cut in base lending rate or is it due to
boost of confidence.
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:05 am
At least here is self-explanatory...you dont need the word "or more"...hence B
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:26 am
jc114 wrote:If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

A. ..

B. Were the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet.

C. Was the ice of Greenland and Antarctica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet or more.

D. If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica was melting, the sea level would rise at 100 feet.

E. Should the ice of Greenland and Antarctica melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

==> wouldn't A be appropriate over B?
No it wouldn't

As atleast would mean atleast 100 or more. Why keep the unnecessary more ? A - Eliminate .

C.and E ask a question instead of referring to hypothetical situation.

D. was melting and would rise....lack of parallelism!

Hence B
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:32 am
jc114 wrote:If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica were to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

A. ..

B. Were the ice of Greenland and Antartica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet.

C. Was the ice of Greenland and Antarctica to melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 fet or more.

D. If the ice of Greenland and Antarctica was melting, the sea level would rise at 100 feet.

E. Should the ice of Greenland and Antarctica melt, the sea level would rise at least 100 feet or more.

==> wouldn't A be appropriate over B?
A) if (simple past verb) then (would/could have )..is correct idiom but here have is missing...so eliminated

c) in hypothetical case we always prefer plural verb

d) same as a and c

e) should is incorrect here

only B survives
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1