Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prep 3

Expert replies
by moneyman » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:29 am
Is it A ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Maxx
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: Prep 3

by iamcste » Thu Nov 20, 2008 4:45 am
moneyman wrote:Is it A ?

IMO D

the purchase of the Home,

the cost of improvements, and

any additonal payment of medical or educational expenses


Parallelism

Nothing wrong with A, but I dont see any parallelism there

Any inputs guys
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:33 am
isn't use of "were" in "D" makes last part a clause ?
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:01 am
I find E better than D.
E puts better parallel structure than D.
What's OA
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:06 am
nah, D maintains the parallelism with of
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:07 am
I'd have to side with iamcste for the parallel structure on this one.

imo D

as iamcste explained
Join the discussion

by jimmiejaz » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:12 am
Can't it be A as it is comparing amount with cost,price and amount.
D compares amount with cost,price and payment

Please explain. I fully understand imcste's point though!!!
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:58 am
I go for E. Look at D, [that were borrowed against the home] modifies [expenses], which makes no sense. It should modify [payment] instead

A is wordy, I think, [ amount.... to pay] = payment
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:02 am
In Choice D

It states:

Any additional payment......... that were

isn't 'any additional payment' singular ???
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:19 am
I think "OF..." and "OF..." construction is designed as a trick in this sentence for whom apply the rules of parallelism without paying attention to the core of the sentence.

If the amount of loan does not exceed - marks the beginning of our list

so X, Y and Z

exceed the purchase price of the home, the cost of improvements, and any additional amount borrowed against the home to pay for medical or educational expenses.

E is using almost the same parallelism here but it is changing to meaning to "any additional payment borrowed " by omitting the word, amount.

So A looks good to me.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:26 am
logitech wrote:I think "OF..." and "OF..." construction is designed as a trick in this sentence for whom apply the rules of parallelism without paying attention to the core of the sentence.

If the amount of loan does not exceed - marks the beginning of our list

so X, Y and Z

exceed the purchase price of the home, the cost of improvements, and any additional amount borrowed against the home to pay for medical or educational expenses.

E is using almost the same parallelism here but it is changing to meaning to "any additional payment borrowed " by omitting the word, amount.

So A looks good to me.
As I mentioned A is not wrong, However is A using parallelism when particularly a list of items are mentioned

If yes, how are items parallel ??
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:20 am
IMO A

B & C easy to eliminate.

D: If we remove of ... part then sentence will become "any additional payment that were borrowed." That has two problems: 1. payment is singular were is plural, and 2. we don't borrow payment.

E: additional payment borrowed is also wrong. We don't borrow payment.

OA plz?
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:33 am
karmayogi wrote:IMO A

B & C easy to eliminate.

D: If we remove of ... part then sentence will become "any additional payment that were borrowed." That has two problems: 1. payment is singular were is plural, and 2. we don't borrow payment.

E: additional payment borrowed is also wrong. We don't borrow payment.

OA plz?
why should I remove "Of" any logic-Is it pertaining to some rule
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:39 am
OA is A, its a bloody 1000 SC question.
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:43 am
niraj_a wrote:OA is A, its a bloody 1000 SC question.
Niraj is right. I knew this!

@ Niraj-why bloody :roll:
Join the discussion