BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PR test - industrial growth

Expert replies
by jayhawk2001 » Fri May 25, 2007 2:28 pm
OA after a few reply.

Chicago, where industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than any other American city, was plagued by labor troubles like the Pullman Strikes of 1894.

A. where industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than any other American city

B. which had industrial growth in the nineteenth century more rapid than that of other American cities

C. which had growth industrially more rapid than any other American city in the nineteenth century

D. whose industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than any other American city

E. whose industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than that of any other American city
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Prasanna » Fri May 25, 2007 6:55 pm
I would go with E. Options A and D have wrong comparisons. C is awkward construction. Between B and E, would chose E.
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Fri May 25, 2007 10:52 pm
Chicago, where industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than any other American city, was plagued by labor troubles like the Pullman Strikes of 1894.

A. where industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than any other American city

B. which had industrial growth in the nineteenth century more rapid than that of other American cities

C. which had growth industrially more rapid than any other American city in the nineteenth century

D. whose industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than any other American city

E. whose industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than that of any other American city

C is clearly out. "growth industrially is awkward"
D wrongly compares the industrial growth of Chicago to "any other industrial city"
B - I find the construction awkward
Between A and E I would root for E....A suffers from the same drawback as D

OA Please
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sat May 26, 2007 8:33 am
OA is E.

I was split between B and E.
"whose" didn't sound right to refer to Chicago but I guess we don't always
get the "perfect" option in one of the choices.
Join the discussion

by veekay » Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:15 pm
jayhawk2001 wrote:OA is E.

I was split between B and E.
"whose" didn't sound right to refer to Chicago but I guess we don't always
get the "perfect" option in one of the choices.
Can anyone please explain why E is chosen over B? B has a past participle "had" showing two events, industrial growth and strikes, in the past. Not sure why everyone picked E and not B
Join the discussion

by Treeram » Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:18 pm
A possesive pronoun should be present , when you say 'as that of' something, the thing previously mentioned should also belong to something. This makes E perfect. Correct me if i am wrong :D
When the going gets tough, the tough gets going
Join the discussion

by beny » Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:59 am
Treeram wrote:A possesive pronoun should be present , when you say 'as that of' something, the thing previously mentioned should also belong to something. This makes E perfect. Correct me if i am wrong :D
You are wrong.

"The population of Chicago is as dense as that of New York."
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:34 am
imo e
Join the discussion

by vidyame » Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:04 pm
E is correct.
A,C,D eliminated due to wrong comparison of growth to any city
B compares growth in chicago to other cities (more is used to compared between 2 objects), also "which had" makes comparison with "that of other American cities" wordy

some information about whose
whose is the only English word we have to refer to inanimate antecedents. Perhaps someone will invent a new word for this purpose, but as of now we're stuck with whose. Going all the way back to the 14th century, you'll find many literary examples of authors referring back to an inanimate antecedent (1). Fowler's quotes Milton's Paradise Lost: "Of man's first disobedience, and the fruit Of that forbidden tree, whose mortal taste Brought death into the world..." (3).
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1