BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PR question - oats

Expert replies
by confuse mind » Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:49 pm
Although fresh oats and corn are the most nutritious foods for cattle, historically, cattle ranchers have minimized purchases of these grains in order to minimize costs due to spoilage. This year, however, fresh oats and corn have become the best-selling food for cattle -- a clear sign that cattle ranchers are putting nutrition ahead of concerns about costs due to spoilage.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

1. No cattle ranchers have reported in surveys that they are attempting to purchase more nutritious fodder for their herds.

2. Because of agricultural innovations, fresh oats and corn spoil much less quickly than in previous years, while costs for such fodder have remained constant.

Confused between the above 2 options, the rest were clear eliminations.

OA - 2. Can someone please explain me why 1 is wrong. 1 clearly contradicts the reason provided in the stimulus - nutrition is the reason
Last edited by confuse mind on Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ankit0411 » Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:44 pm
confuse mind wrote:Although fresh oats and corn are the most nutritious foods for cattle, historically, cattle ranchers have minimized purchases of these grains in order to minimize costs due to spoilage. This year, however, fresh oats and corn have become the best-selling food for cattle -- a clear sign that cattle ranchers are putting nutrition ahead of concerns about costs due to spoilage.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

No cattle ranchers have reported in surveys that they are attempting to purchase more nutritious fodder for their herds.

Because of agricultural innovations, fresh oats and corn spoil much less quickly than in previous years, while costs for such fodder have remained constant.

Confused between the above 2 options, the rest were clear eliminations.
OA - 2. Can someone please explain me why B is wrong. B clearly contradicts the reason provided in the stimulus - nutrition is the reason
The first statement really does nothing to talk about cost v/s nutrition . Like your eliminated other choices , by POE I would have struck off this option as well.

Thanks,
Ankit
Don't predict future , create it !
Join the discussion

by saketlala » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:16 am
Conclusion :cattle ranchers are putting nutrition ahead of concerns about costs due to spoilage.

Clearly, statement say "Nutrition ahead of Cost" and 2 weakens the same while other stmnt has no impact.
Join the discussion

by confuse mind » Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:39 pm
In 1, the cattle ranchers have NOT been reported to lay emphasis on nutrition and thus goes against the conclusion. No?
This is the source of confusion.

Is survey data irrelevant?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:10 am
confuse mind wrote:In 1, the cattle ranchers have NOT been reported to lay emphasis on nutrition and thus goes against the conclusion. No?
This is the source of confusion.

Is survey data irrelevant?
No cattle ranchers IN SURVEYS is the equivalent of SOME cattle ranchers.
There is no indication HOW MANY cattle ranchers participated in the survey.
For all we know, only a handful of cattle ranchers participated -- too small a number to have any effect on the argument.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion