BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PR/GMAT/GMATPrep/MGMAT

Expert replies
by givemeanid » Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:30 am
Does anyone have their Princeton Review CAT scores along with GMAT/GMATPrep/MGMAT scores? I am trying to get an idea of how PR scores stack up. I know that PR doesn't mimic the real GMAT scoring algorithm but comparing them side by side to others might give some idea. Thoughts?
So It Goes
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by lanter1 » Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:25 am
I have scored from 650 to 720 on PR and 720 on my first GMATPREP. I don't think PR is very accurate. I had one quant section where I missed 3 questions and scored a 42. In that section I got 2 out of 3 probability questions correct.

Both MGMAT tests have been 690. Missed the first question on a quant section and scored 42, but scored 45 on the second.
Join the discussion

by beatthegmat » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:30 pm
lanter1 wrote:I have scored from 650 to 720 on PR and 720 on my first GMATPREP. I don't think PR is very accurate. I had one quant section where I missed 3 questions and scored a 42. In that section I got 2 out of 3 probability questions correct.

Both MGMAT tests have been 690. Missed the first question on a quant section and scored 42, but scored 45 on the second.
I actually have a different experience--I thought that PR produced scores that were fairly close to GMATPrep. Not as familiar with MGMAT practice tests though...
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses

Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Join the discussion

MGMAT

by Krazie85 » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:28 pm
my opinion on mgmat is that the verbal is spot on to the real test. You can expect to get what you have been scoring on those verbals. The quant is harder on mgmat but if you get through a couple of their quant sections on their practice tests, the gmat quant will be much less stressful and time consuming. One time i had to guess on like 5 mgmat quants and on the real gmat I had like 5 mins left in quant when i ended.
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:45 pm
Eric, I just finished the fourth (and last) PR CAT and I wouldn't mind too much if the PR scores are close to GMATPrep :) :) However, I feel the quant is relatively easier. Also, the test never seemed to get any harder as the it progresses even if you are answering the questions correctly. Was your experience any different?

Krazie85, I am thinking of getting the MGMAT test package (as a part of SC book). I am still working on my OG book and will probably get the MGMAT SC guide after that. So, I'll have to wait till I can take the MGMAT CATs.
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by beatthegmat » Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:42 pm
Yes, I should clarify my earlier comment. I thought that the PR scores were relatively on par with GMATPrep, but the PR questions themselves felt a little easier than GMATPrep...
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses

Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Join the discussion

by fsar45 » Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:59 pm
Actually, the PR scoring algorithm is pretty close to the real thing, so your scores should be pretty reliable.
Join the discussion

Re: MGMAT

by Sadowski » Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:01 am
Krazie85 wrote:my opinion on mgmat is that the verbal is spot on to the real test. You can expect to get what you have been scoring on those verbals. The quant is harder on mgmat but if you get through a couple of their quant sections on their practice tests, the gmat quant will be much less stressful and time consuming. One time i had to guess on like 5 mgmat quants and on the real gmat I had like 5 mins left in quant when i ended.
I couldn't agree more with this. I took an MGMAT test one weekend and felt quite surprised by the difficulty of the math section. I ended up getting a 45 on quant and felt pretty good about it considering that I felt like I was running out of time on most questions. The next weekend, I took my 2nd GMAT Prep test and felt exactly opposite. All the questions seemed so easy that I thought I was bombing. In fact, I scored a 49 in quant. I would highly recommend working with MGMAT - you'll feel very good about your skills when you're done with it.
Join the discussion