BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PR CR - Electronic goods

Expert replies
by jayhawk2001 » Sat May 26, 2007 2:30 pm
A small country, Country S, has instituted a hefty tax on imported electronics in an attempt to protect the largest company and employer in the country. As a result of this import tax, the national electronics company is now able to compete in the electronics market.

Which of the following can be inferred from the information above?

A. Only small quantities of electronics from companies outside of Country S will now be sold in Country S.

B. To take further advantage of the import tax, the national electronics company will expand its product line.

C. Electronics have become more expensive to import not only due to the added import taxes but also due to increased transportation costs.

D. Electronics are cheaper to produce outside Country S than inside Country S.

E. The national electronics company not only sells electronics products in Country S but also exports them to Country T and Country U.


Answers with explanations please.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Cybermusings » Sun May 27, 2007 2:39 am
A small country, Country S, has instituted a hefty tax on imported electronics in an attempt to protect the largest company and employer in the country. As a result of this import tax, the national electronics company is now able to compete in the electronics market.

Which of the following can be inferred from the information above?

A. Only small quantities of electronics from companies outside of Country S will now be sold in Country S.

B. To take further advantage of the import tax, the national electronics company will expand its product line.

C. Electronics have become more expensive to import not only due to the added import taxes but also due to increased transportation costs.

D. Electronics are cheaper to produce outside Country S than inside Country S.

E. The national electronics company not only sells electronics products in Country S but also exports them to Country T and Country U.

B - clearly out since it stretches the statement a bit too far. We cannot infer B from the argument
C - Nothing in the argument mentions anything remotely connected to transportation costs. Hence eliminate
A - Again we cannot infer this from the argument
E - We do not know the geograhic regions in which the products are sold from the argument. Neither can we infer it.

I think the answer should be D. Since the argument mentions that the imposition of the hefty tax enabled the indigenous enterprises of Country S to “compete” within the domestic market, it implies the fact that foreign goods sans the “handicap” of taxes would be more price-attractive than domestic goods.
Join the discussion

by Prasanna » Sun May 27, 2007 7:13 pm
I will also go with D
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun May 27, 2007 7:36 pm
Yep. OA is indeed D.

Nice one Cybermusings and Prasanna. I was split between A and D but
I guess A takes the argument too far.
Join the discussion

by ldoolitt » Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:34 am
This seems sort of funny to me and here is why. Say that imports from outside Country S are already more expensive than inside but that people still buy foreign products because their quality is far superior. But say country S taxes the foreign products so that no one inside Country S can afford them. They are then forced (if they need them) to buy products inside Country S. It doesn't say that the national electronics company is now competitive in the market outside Country S...or is that implied when they say they are able to "compete in the electronics market"?
Join the discussion

by mankey » Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:46 am
I too went with D.

Thanks.
Join the discussion