BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Powerscore practice question

Expert replies
by mundasingh123 » Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:28 pm
One of the most vexing problems in historiography is dating an event when the usual sources offer conflicting chronologies of the event.Historians whould attempt to minimize the number of competing sources ,perhaps by eliminating the less credible ones .Once this is achieved and several sources are left,as often happens , historians may try ,though on occasion unsuccessfully,to determine independently of the usual sources which date is more likely to bwe right.
Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information above?

a)We have no plausible chronology of most of the events for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date.
b)Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies abd for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians
c)Attaching a reliable date to any event requires determining which of several conflicting chronologies is most likely to be true
d)Determining independently of the usual sources which of several conflicting chronologies is more likely to be right ia an ineffective way of dating events
e)The soundest approach to dating an event for which the usual sources give conflicting chronologies is to undermine the credibility of as many of these sources as possible.
OA later
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by g000fy » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:07 pm
Is it B
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:10 am
i m stuck between b n c

i will go with B
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:36 am
One of the most vexing problems in historiography is dating an event when the usual sources offer conflicting chronologies of the event.Historians whould attempt to minimize the number of competing sources ,perhaps by eliminating the less credible ones .Once this is achieved and several sources are left,as often happens , historians may try ,though on occasion unsuccessfully,to determine independently of the usual sources which date is more likely to be right.

Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information above?

a)We have no plausible chronology of most of the events for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date.

b)Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies abd for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians
This hold out for me.
I would like to put my money on this one.

c)Attaching a reliable date to any event requires determining which of several conflicting chronologies is most likely to be true
I think this does not go with the passage because passage says often unsuccessfully So we can't be sure even after we find the best chronology from the group of chronology that we are dating an event successfully.
This option could be true but it said in must be true questions could be true options are good to disguise you but they are not the correct answers.

d)Determining independently of the usual sources which of several conflicting chronologies is more likely to be right is an ineffective way of dating events

e)The soundest approach to dating an event for which the usual sources give conflicting chronologies is to undermine the credibility of as many of these sources as possible.

What's the official Answer?
Join the discussion

by lokesh r » Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:16 am
IMO B.

C i feel is wrong because it talks about 'dating any event' which is very universal. which should be avoided in GMAT.

OA plz..
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:37 am
the OA is B.However,i dont agree with it because i dont feel the stimulus contains enough info for us to conclude that the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians .The stimulus tells us that the historians can use two methods to get the exact date.It does not say that the two methods mentioned are the only methods existing in the world
Join the discussion