BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Poverty line

Expert replies
by crak.gmat » Sun Sep 14, 2008 4:18 pm
The United States government uses only a household's cash income before taxes to determine whether that household falls below the poverty line in a given year; capital gains, non-cash government benefits, and tax credits are not included. However, yearly cash income is not a fool-proof measure of a given household's disposable income. For example, retirees who live off of capital gains from an extensive portfolio could earn hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet be classified by the government as living in "poverty" because this income is not included in the calculation.

Which of the following, if true, validates the contention that the government's calculation methods must be altered in order to provide statistics that measure true poverty?
A. For more than 99% of those classified as living in poverty, yearly cash income comprises the vast majority of each household's disposable income.
B. While the government’s calculation method indicated a 12.5% poverty rate in 2003, the same calculation method indicated anywhere from a 9% to a 16% poverty rate during the preceding decade.
C. Most established research studies conducted by the private sector indicate that the number of people truly living in poverty in the U.S. is less than that indicated by the government’s calculation method.
D. Several prominent economists endorse an alternate calculation method which incorporates all income, not just cash income, and adjusts for taxes paid and other core expenses.
E. The government’s calculation method also erroneously counts those who do not earn income in a given year but who have substantial assets on which to live during that year.



Explanations??

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

(c)

by rogue_rohit » Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:51 am
I will go with (c).

Explanation

The rationale for altering the method of calculating poverty statistics can only be that the current method does give an accurate account of the true poverty.

Solution (c) compares the government results with most established research studies. It shows that the government method includes a lot false positives in the statistics and hence an inflated poverty percentage. Hence it should be changed
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:13 am
IMO: A
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:33 am
C for me.
Join the discussion

by banker1 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:03 pm
IMO: C

I was between (C) and (E).

(A) weakens the contention that the calculation needs to be altered.

(B) is irrelevant

(C) provides information that the government's calculation is wrong and should be altered

(D) doesn't provide information as to the erroneous nature of the government's calculation

(E) is another piece of information about the government's calculation and its erroneous nature but is not as good as (C).
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:36 pm
E is almost indirectly stated in the pessage so can not be the answer.

C is the correct ans.
Join the discussion

by mastbombay » Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:45 pm
Method used by Govt gives an inflated % of those who live below poverty.

To rectify this problem , we require a new method that shud report accurate statics.

As E just restates the info stated in the passage, C is the right answer.

It compares the statics reproted by the most establsihed agency ( Hence can be trusted to be accurate ) with those reported by the govt. and clearly tells that stats reported by govt are faulty in that they inflate the % of those living below povety line.

Hence this choice supports the contention that new method must be used.
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 11:51 am
What's wrong with A.
Also how can we believe the results of private company and based on those results say that those reported by government are false. It may be possible that private company has something wrong and got wrong results.
Join the discussion

by lachlanc » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:44 pm
gmat009 wrote:What's wrong with A.
Also how can we believe the results of private company and based on those results say that those reported by government are false. It may be possible that private company has something wrong and got wrong results.
gmat009, the question asks "Which of the following, if true, validates the contention that the government's calculation methods must be altered in order to provide statistics that measure true poverty?"

(A) does not validate that the contention, it weakens it!
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:58 am
I believe the correct answer should be A.
Join the discussion