BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

potential investors

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times
by ketkoag » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:58 am
Not one of the potential investors is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were not to be concluded.
A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were
B. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was
C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
D. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
E. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were

Please confirm the answer..
IMO : C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:42 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by mittalashwani13 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:07 am
is it A?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
GMAT Score:710

by rahulg83 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:45 am
A for me as well.....
subject is Not one, which is always singular unlike 'none'.
B,C,D and E all have S-V agreement error
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:41 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:770

by raghavsarathy » Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:09 am
IMHO - A

B , C , E - Plural "they" and "them" are used in these options which is wrong as we are referring to the bank signing the agreeement. "It" would have been appropriate.

D - "provision for penalties included" is awkward. Hence ruled out.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:37 am
IMO B.

A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

deal....were = S-V mismatch.

B. is expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal was

Correct. Here IMO they refer to investors.

C. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement be signed by them with a provision for penalties if the deal were
deal....were = S-V mismatch.

D. are expected to make an offer for buying First Interstate Bank until it signs a merger agreement with a provision for penalties included if the deal was
One of the Xs <singular> paradigm broken.

E. are expected to be making an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until they sign a merger agreement including a provision for penalties if the deal were
One of the Xs <singular> paradigm broken.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 7 times

by vinayakdl » Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:41 am
I will go with A as well

Vinayak
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:15 am
vinayakdl wrote:I will go with A as well

Vinayak
Looks like B and D can be kicked out because of

"if....was"...

since this is a hypothetical situation...and as Manhattan says in hypothetical situation we need to have "if....were"....

is my reasoning correct...or there is something else that I am missing?
Last edited by goelmohit2002 on Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
GMAT Score:710

by rahulg83 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:16 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

deal....were = S-V mismatch.
'If the deal were' is correct...Hypothetical subjunctive :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:21 am
rahulg83 wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:
A. is expected to make an offer to buy First Interstate Bank until a merger agreement is signed that includes a provision for penalties if the deal were

deal....were = S-V mismatch.
'If the deal were' is correct...Hypothetical subjunctive :)
Yes got it!

Thanks!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 1:01 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 7 times

by vinayakdl » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:46 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
vinayakdl wrote:I will go with A as well

Vinayak
Looks like B and D can be kicked out because of

"if....was"...

since this is a hypothetical situation...and as Manhattan says in hypothetical situation we need to have "if....was"....

is my reasoning correct...or there is something else that I am missing?

good catch...could be...may be some expert here can comment on that...i eleminated B because of "they", they seems to refer to the bank managers etc...not mentioned in the sentence...

Vinayak

Vinayak
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:06 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by perfectstranger » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:19 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
vinayakdl wrote:I will go with A as well

Vinayak
Looks like B and D can be kicked out because of

"if....was"...

since this is a hypothetical situation...and as Manhattan says in hypothetical situation we need to have "if....were"....

is my reasoning correct...or there is something else that I am missing?
A looks fine except if....were . How that can be a a hypothetical situation?
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:23 am
perfectstranger wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:
vinayakdl wrote:I will go with A as well

Vinayak
Looks like B and D can be kicked out because of

"if....was"...

since this is a hypothetical situation...and as Manhattan says in hypothetical situation we need to have "if....were"....

is my reasoning correct...or there is something else that I am missing?
A looks fine except if....were . How that can be a a hypothetical situation?
Make this a thumb rule for GMAT:

If....was
if....would

is never correct in GMAT....

Note that this is hypothetical because some XYZ action is required if some PQR does not happen...

here not happening of PQR is a hypothetical situation.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by ketkoag » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:30 am
Does "them" in C refers to potential investers?? coz i selected that option by considering this fact..
does subjunctive should always have "that" with it...?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times

by mehravikas » Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:17 am
IMO - A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 36 times

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:25 am
ketkoag wrote:Does "them" in C refers to potential investers??
IMO Logically it try to refer to bank...which is a singular entity...so pronoun-case mismatch....
ketkoag wrote:does subjunctive should always have "that" with it...?
IMO Yes....can someone please tell if there is any exception to this rule.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked