Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Postage Rates

Expert replies
by brittbeck2 » Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:45 am
can anyone explain the attached question? THanks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by raunekk » Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:05 am
In my opinion,

conclusion:neither the subcriber nor the advertizer will be lost.

We need to weaken this.

D says,
the total amount spend by advertisers per issue will not change .

The advertisers who have stipulated total number of advertizments per magazine and per issue will look for other magazines to compensate for the number of advertisements pending to be published due to reduction of issues.(as they are gonna keep their spending budget same).

Thus Advertizers will be lost.
This weakens.
Join the discussion

by kiranlegend » Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:15 am
IMO D

A does nothing to the argument. Agreed the postal charges will be more than one-third.. at the same time the magzine company probably can use their production costs for the reduced production towards this.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:57 am
can somebody please explain this?
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:10 am
Detailed explanation:


same amount per issue
so now no of issues have reduced hence the ad income will reduce
so this will make profits to decline

Ex:
now A gives 5 add per issue
total issues = 52
total ads = 52*5

after reduction in no of issues
total issues = 26
total ads = 26*5

so company will lose income from remianing 26*5 ads




Regarding A
new issue will cost 1/3 more to mail
no problem as currently we reducing no of issues by half

Ex:
postage cost per issue rt now = 30
issues = 52

total cost = 52*30

after reduction in no of issues
cost = 30+10 = 40
issues = 26

total cost = 26*40 [which is less than 52*30]
so here profits will increase
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:30 am
thanks for expln,but am still not clear.

This is how i look at it-- Ad guys who wish to x$ for 52 issues now spend the same x$ for 26 issues.How does this reduce the profit?
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:34 am
aj5105 wrote:thanks for expln,but am still not clear.

This is how i look at it-- Ad guys who wish to x$ for 52 issues now spend the same x$ for 26 issues.How does this reduce the profit?
its written that a typical issue will cost more
"a typical issue" tells us that the cost is given for an issue and not the whole cost
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Thu May 12, 2016 1:08 pm
Answer is clearly D here.
Join the discussion