BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Politician P.

Expert replies
by vikramveer » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:17 am
Politician P: My opponent claims that the government is obligated to raise taxes to increase funding for schools and health care. Because raising taxes to increase funding for schools and health care would make taxpayers upset over their loss of buying power, my opponent is simply mistaken.
Politician P's reasoning is questionable because it involves
(A) presupposing that a claim is mistaken on the grounds that the person defending it advocates other unpopular views
(B) assuming that a claim is false on the grounds that the person defending it is of questionable character
(C) concluding that a view is false on the grounds that its implementation would lead to unhappiness
(D) appealing to wholly irrelevant issues to deflect attention away from the real issue
(E) insisting that an obligation exists without offering any evidence that exists


Please provide reasons for selecting and for removing an option.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by saurabhmahajan » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:37 am
IMO: C

becoz Politician P mentions that people would be upset and concludes that the opponent is mistaken.

OPTION C proves this

OA please.
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by vikramveer » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:05 am
OA is C. But could you please explain whats wrong with A?
Join the discussion

by saurabhmahajan » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:21 am
Vikram A is wrong becoz politician P does not advocates or present any of his own views.He just counter attacks his opponent's view. and thus he is not defending his view. which A says so.
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by samudranb » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:59 am
(A) presupposing that a claim is mistaken on the grounds that the person defending it advocates other unpopular views
In this, the "person defending it" = "opponent" mentioned by Politician P.
We have no idea about the opponent advocating "other unpopular views".

Hence it is out of scope.

(E.g. if it had been mentioned that he is FOR the death penalty, which 99% of the people in his constituency disagree with... and Politician P uses THIS as his counter-argument, then A would have been the perfect answer.)

IMHO, C is right.
Join the discussion

by atrayee345 » Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:17 am
The argument's conclusion is that the politician's opponent is simply mistaken. The evidence for this claim is that people would be unhappy with it. The flaw here is that just because people would be unhappy with something, doesn't it make it the wrong thing to do. So, Choice C correctly describes the absurd reasoning in the stimulus.
Join the discussion