Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Politician P.

Expert replies
by vikramveer » Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:17 am
Politician P: My opponent claims that the government is obligated to raise taxes to increase funding for schools and health care. Because raising taxes to increase funding for schools and health care would make taxpayers upset over their loss of buying power, my opponent is simply mistaken.
Politician P’s reasoning is questionable because it involves
(A) presupposing that a claim is mistaken on the grounds that the person defending it advocates other unpopular views
(B) assuming that a claim is false on the grounds that the person defending it is of questionable character
(C) concluding that a view is false on the grounds that its implementation would lead to unhappiness
(D) appealing to wholly irrelevant issues to deflect attention away from the real issue
(E) insisting that an obligation exists without offering any evidence that exists


Please provide reasons for selecting and for removing an option.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by saurabhmahajan » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:37 am
IMO: C

becoz Politician P mentions that people would be upset and concludes that the opponent is mistaken.

OPTION C proves this

OA please.
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by vikramveer » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:05 am
OA is C. But could you please explain whats wrong with A?
Join the discussion

by saurabhmahajan » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:21 am
Vikram A is wrong becoz politician P does not advocates or present any of his own views.He just counter attacks his opponent's view. and thus he is not defending his view. which A says so.
Thanks and regards,
Saurabh Mahajan

I can understand you not winning,but i will not forgive you for not trying.
Join the discussion

by samudranb » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:59 am
(A) presupposing that a claim is mistaken on the grounds that the person defending it advocates other unpopular views
In this, the "person defending it" = "opponent" mentioned by Politician P.
We have no idea about the opponent advocating "other unpopular views".

Hence it is out of scope.

(E.g. if it had been mentioned that he is FOR the death penalty, which 99% of the people in his constituency disagree with... and Politician P uses THIS as his counter-argument, then A would have been the perfect answer.)

IMHO, C is right.
Join the discussion

by atrayee345 » Wed Dec 19, 2018 3:17 am
The argument's conclusion is that the politician's opponent is simply mistaken. The evidence for this claim is that people would be unhappy with it. The flaw here is that just because people would be unhappy with something, doesn't it make it the wrong thing to do. So, Choice C correctly describes the absurd reasoning in the stimulus.
Join the discussion