Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Politician: Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel per kilo

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:11 am
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

Politician: Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel per kilometer than nonhybrids. And fuel produces air pollution, which contributes to a number of environmental problems. Motorists can save money by driving cars that are more fuel efficient, and they will be encouraged to drive hybrid cars if we make them aware of that fact. Therefore, we can help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars in this country by highlighting this advantage of hybrid cars.

Which of the following, if true, would most indicate a vulnerability of the politician's argument?

(A) People with more fuel-efficient cars typically drive more than do those with less fuel-efficient cars.
(B) Not all air pollution originates from automobiles.
(C) Hybrid cars have already begun to gain popularity.
(D) Fuel-efficient alternatives to hybrid cars will likely become available in the future.
(E) The future cost of gasoline and other fuel cannot be predicted with absolute precision or certainty.

OA A

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:27 am
Premise: Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel per kilometer than non-hybrids. And fuel produces all pollution, which contributes to a number of environmental problems.
Conclusion: Motorists can save money by driving cars that are more fuel-efficient such as hybrid cars in order to help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars in this country by highlighting this advantage of hybrid cars.

Option A - Correct
This option weakens the politician's argument because the argument wasn't to compare the driving ability of people with more fuel-efficient cars and to those with less fuel-efficient cars.

Option B - Incorrect
This is wrong because the argument is concerned about the advantage of driving hybrid cars and its minimal pollution effect and not on other sources of air pollution. This is not in line with the politician's argument.

Option C - Incorrect
According to the passage, we can't know whether or not Hybrid cars have begun to gain popularity.

Option D - Incorrect
This claim is off point with respect to the politician's claim.

Option E - Incorrect
This claim is strictly based on the future cost of gasoline and other fuel which is not similar to the argument.
Join the discussion