BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Politician: All nations that place a high tax on income

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:44 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Politician: All nations that place a high tax on income produce thereby a negative incentive for technological innovation, and all nations in which technological innovation is hampered inevitably fall behind in the international arms race. Those nations that, through historical accident or the foolishness of their political leadership, wind up in a strategically disadvantageous position are destined to lose their voice in the world affairs. So if a nation wants to maintain its value system and way of life, it must not allow its highest tax bracket to exceed 30 percent of income.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the politician's argument EXCEPT:

(A) The top level of taxation must reach 45 percent before taxation begins to deter inventors and industrialists from introducing new technologies and industries.

(B) Making a great deal of money is an insignificant factor in driving technological innovation.

(C) Falling behind in the international arms race does not necessarily lead to a strategically less advantageous position.

(D) Those nations that lose influence in the world community do not necessarily suffer from a threat to their value system or way of life.

(E) Allowing one's country to lose its technological edge, especially as concerns weaponry, would be foolish rather than merely a historical accident.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Jul 20, 2018 10:18 pm
Option A - INCORRECT.
This option has weakens the politician argument. The politician has made his point on 30% of taxation at most for a favorable investment atmosphere and not 45% that sound outrageous and might scare investors and industrialist away and create no room for new industries and technological innovations.

Option B - CORRECT.
This option is the most suitable option to express the politician's argument. Making a great deal of money through high TAX on income collected from citizens is an insignificant factor in driving technological innovation. Because after making an outrageous accumulated fund the selfish politician will still savage most of it and use little to finance technological innovation and industrialization. However, with this motive or action the nation won't be able to maintain the value and way of life of the nation and this may lead the nation to loose its voice in World affairs.

Option C - INCORRECT.
Falling behind in the international arms race is of great disadvantage to a nation, because it implies that the nation is of poor growth, uncivilized and has no value for technology innovation.

Option D - INCORRECT.
Nations that lose influence in the world community suffer from a threat to their value system and way of life and this is caused by high tax place on income which thereby produce a negative incentive for technological innovations.

Option E - INCORRECT.
This option is also in support of the politicians argument but not strong enough. Allowing one's nation to lose its technological edge is foolishness and not just a mere historical accident, because this foolishness has caused the nation to suffer from threat on value system and way of life also causing the nation to lose their voice and position in the world affairs.
Join the discussion