BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Political fund-raisers

Expert replies
by reply2spg » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:03 pm
Political fund-raisers tend to have greater success when soliciting donations if they let people know that others have already contributed to the cause in question. These fund-raisers must walk a fine line, however, since people will feel little motivation to donate to a political group that they believe is over-funded.

Which one of the following represents the conclusion that can be most reasonably drawn from the information in the passage above?

A) People sometimes choose to donate to political causes on the basis of their perception of others' behavior.

B) Political groups are rarely over funded.

C) An over funded political group will rarely succeed in getting donations.

D) People will donate to a political group that is under funded.

E) People do not base their decision to donate to a political group on the political aims of the group.

OA Later
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by reply2spg » Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:16 pm
Can anybody take a chance?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by rayapudisandeep » Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:26 pm
I would like to do an attempt answering this question. I would chose C.

a: the word sometimes seems to be contradicting first sentence in stimulus. It say that people donate when someone else already donated to the cause

b: irrelevant
d: the last sentence of stimulus seems to be contradicting this
e: opposite of first sentence

waiting for ur reviews...
Join the discussion

by pnk » Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:54 pm
Political fund-raisers tend to have greater success when soliciting donations if they let people know that others have already contributed to the cause in question. These fund-raisers must walk a fine line, however, since people will feel little motivation to donate to a political group that they believe is over-funded.

Which one of the following represents the conclusion that can be most reasonably drawn from the information in the passage above?

A) People sometimes choose to donate to political causes on the basis of their perception of others' behavior.

B) Political groups are rarely over funded - cann say so strongly

C) An over funded political group will rarely succeed in getting donations. - argument says "over funded" group may not have greater success - this does not mean they will rarely succeed

D) People will donate to a political group that is under funded. - out of scope

E) People do not base their decision to donate to a political group on the political aims of the group. - out of scope

IMO A
Join the discussion

by getso » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:36 pm
IMOE
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:48 pm
reply2spg wrote:Political fund-raisers tend to have greater success when soliciting donations if they let people know that others have already contributed to the cause in question. These fund-raisers must walk a fine line, however, since people will feel little motivation to donate to a political group that they believe is over-funded.

Which one of the following represents the conclusion that can be most reasonably drawn from the information in the passage above?

A) People sometimes choose to donate to political causes on the basis of their perception of others' behavior.

B) Political groups are rarely over funded.

C) An over funded political group will rarely succeed in getting donations.

D) People will donate to a political group that is under funded.

E) People do not base their decision to donate to a political group on the political aims of the group.

OA Later
IMO A[/spoiler]

the argument does not mention political behavior.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:55 am
OA is A
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion