BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Political Advertisement CR.

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 4:36 am
by sumittaneja009 » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:21 am
Hi,

Can someone please help me with the CR below:

Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:25 am
Location: New York, US

by slash » Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:50 am
I will go with the option D.

In delmonts tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.


A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

[b]We dont have suffcient data for average jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont tenure - So this is out of scope.[/b]

B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

[b]The same again.[/b]

C.Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.

[b]This point does not fit the conclusion at all. The conclusion is average paycheck increases steadily. The average paycheck reamin same if the jobs were eliminated again.[/b]

D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.

[b]If the average pay for jobs eliminated in the city is equal every year to average pay for jobs citywide. The average pay check in city has been increased steadily, this can be achieved only when newly created jobs were offerd with more pay. This is the correct answer.[/b]

E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

[b]Out of scope.[/b]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 15 times

by schumi_gmat » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:25 am
Yes Explanation by Slah is Correct

IMO D

conclusion Avg. Pay is increasing

Avg pay = total pay / no of jobs

so total pay has to increase or no of jobs have to decrease.

Premise: New jobs > elim jobs
new pay > avg pay

therefore, for total pay to increase, the pay for elim job <= avg.
Which is option D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:730

by Carloblacksun » Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:40 am
I agree...

What could WEAKEN the conclusion?

If the job lost have a VERY HIGH WAGE, then the new jobs created, even if they are greater in quantity and better paid than the avg., do not compensate the loss of TOP JOBS...

SO...D!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 163
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:54 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by jeevan.Gk » Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:37 am
D here !! .. tats strengthening.. its supporting missing evidence in the argument
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 5:32 pmFollowed by: 16 members
Location: NY and Boston
Thanked: 56 times

by Karen » Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Just stopped in to see if y'all needed my help on this one, but instead I'll weigh in to say you guys clearly have this one handled. The explanation above for why it's D is good.
Karen van Hoek, PhD
Verbal Specialist

Test Prep New York
maximize your score, minimize your stress
www.testprepny.com
[email protected]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:58 am

by vanessa.m » Fri May 13, 2016 1:53 am
I believe the correct answer should be D.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 4:03 am

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 1:54 am
I will Go with option D in this case
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1