Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Point of price viability_paradox

Expert replies
by bubblehead0922 » Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:40 pm
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?

A. The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.
B. The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.
C. Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.
D.Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.
E. When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut.



Hi all,

I found this CR question (from Princeton Review GMAT Test 10) a bit confusing for me. The correct answer is C. Can someone please explain the difference between choice A and choice C? What is the thing makes C but not A the best explanation?

Thx for your time in advance,
Victoria
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by elias.latour.apex » Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:59 am
The problem with this question (and others of its type) is usually that the person does not clearly understand what is being asked. Let's imagine, for the sake of argument, that you want to make paper. The question you are asking yourself is whether it is better to use recycled materials or new materials to do so. We will assume that concerns about the environment are irrelevant to you and that the only guiding principle you have is the price.

This price, stated in the argument as the "point of price viability" was $2.12 per ream (500 sheets) of paper 20 years ago. By this we mean that if the price is $2.11 we should use new paper whereas if the price is $2.13 then we should use recycled paper.

Since that time, it has become less expensive to make recycled paper. Accordingly, one might expect that the "point of price viability" has changed. In reality, however, it is unchanged.

How can we explain this? Undoubtedly it has also become cheaper to make new paper products. One of the choices will clearly show that.

Answer choice A may seem tempting. However, this answer choice doesn't definitely say that it is cheaper to produce paper products. Choice Adoes say that the cost of unprocessed trees has fallen, but we cannot conclude from that alone that it is less expensive now than it used to be to make new paper products.

Answer choice C, on the other hand, clearly states that it is now more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

You might also want to take a look at the thread https://www.beatthegmat.com/economic-via ... 87674.html
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Join the discussion