BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Point of price viability_paradox

Expert replies
by bubblehead0922 » Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:40 pm
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the cost of equipment have made recycling paper into new paper products much more cost-efficient over the last twenty years. Despite these advances, though, the "point of price viability" (the price that new paper made from trees must reach to make recycled paper comparable in price) is unchanged at $2.12 per ream of paper.

Which of the following, if true, most explains why the increased cost-efficiency of recycled paper has not lowered the point of price viability?

A. The cost of unprocessed trees to make new paper has fallen dramatically.
B. The decreases in the cost of recycling equipment have occurred despite increases in the cost of raw materials required to manufacture such equipment.
C. Innovations in production technology have made it much more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.
D.Most paper is made from the scraps and sawdust left after processing new trees for lumber, rather than directly from the trees themselves.
E. When the price of planting new saplings to replace cut trees becomes more expensive, forests reserves not previously worth cutting become cost-effective to cut.



Hi all,

I found this CR question (from Princeton Review GMAT Test 10) a bit confusing for me. The correct answer is C. Can someone please explain the difference between choice A and choice C? What is the thing makes C but not A the best explanation?

Thx for your time in advance,
Victoria
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by elias.latour.apex » Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:59 am
The problem with this question (and others of its type) is usually that the person does not clearly understand what is being asked. Let's imagine, for the sake of argument, that you want to make paper. The question you are asking yourself is whether it is better to use recycled materials or new materials to do so. We will assume that concerns about the environment are irrelevant to you and that the only guiding principle you have is the price.

This price, stated in the argument as the "point of price viability" was $2.12 per ream (500 sheets) of paper 20 years ago. By this we mean that if the price is $2.11 we should use new paper whereas if the price is $2.13 then we should use recycled paper.

Since that time, it has become less expensive to make recycled paper. Accordingly, one might expect that the "point of price viability" has changed. In reality, however, it is unchanged.

How can we explain this? Undoubtedly it has also become cheaper to make new paper products. One of the choices will clearly show that.

Answer choice A may seem tempting. However, this answer choice doesn't definitely say that it is cheaper to produce paper products. Choice Adoes say that the cost of unprocessed trees has fallen, but we cannot conclude from that alone that it is less expensive now than it used to be to make new paper products.

Answer choice C, on the other hand, clearly states that it is now more cost-efficient to produce new paper from trees.

You might also want to take a look at the thread https://www.beatthegmat.com/economic-via ... 87674.html
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Join the discussion